Class politics in financialized economies: evidence from the United Kingdom, 1983–2019

Abstract The finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE) industries of advanced economies are highly profitable and politically influential. However, like in other industries, FIRE revenues are distributed unevenly between different classes of workers. I examine the implications of these distributive patterns for individual attitudes toward government spending, inflation, income inequality, and taxes. Using large-scale survey data from the UK, I find that employees in the FIRE sector are more likely to support policies that, in principle, protect the unique sources of financial revenues than are employees in non-FIRE sectors, even after accounting for personal income levels. I also find that an employee’s class position—defined in terms of their workplace authority and professional credentials—significantly moderates these sectoral differences in attitudes. Specifically, differences are larger among managers and professional workers than among non-professional workers. I conclude by discussing how these differences may affect class political alignments in financialized economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaf037
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Class politics in financialized economies: evidence from the United Kingdom, 1983–2019

Jake Burchard
Socio-Economic Review
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Class politics in financialized economies: evidence from the United Kingdom, 1983–2019

Jake Burchard
article en

Abstract

Abstract The finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE) industries of advanced economies are highly profitable and politically influential. However, like in other industries, FIRE revenues are distributed unevenly between different classes of workers. I examine the implications of these distributive patterns for individual attitudes toward government spending, inflation, income inequality, and taxes. Using large-scale survey data from the UK, I find that employees in the FIRE sector are more likely to support policies that, in principle, protect the unique sources of financial revenues than are employees in non-FIRE sectors, even after accounting for personal income levels. I also find that an employee’s class position—defined in terms of their workplace authority and professional credentials—significantly moderates these sectoral differences in attitudes. Specifically, differences are larger among managers and professional workers than among non-professional workers. I conclude by discussing how these differences may affect class political alignments in financialized economies.

Socio-Economic ReviewVol. 23(4)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.