La fenomenicidad de la tecnología. Cruces entre la hermenéutica de lafacticidad, la postfenomenología y la fenomenología de la donación

In his phenomenological-hermeneutical work, Martin Heidegger allows us to think about the technological phenomenon through the existential of the useful (Zuhandenheit) but also according to the “imposition” (Gestell) of an alienating nature. This work exposes two reactions to the Heideggerian approach to technology. Don Ihde fuses phenomenology and pragmatism in postphenomenology, proposing a material hermeneutics in which the practical is a priority and technoscience, together with the doing of Homo Faber, configure subjectivity. On the other hand, Jean-Luc Marion proposes a counter-intentionality under the call-response structure, with a strong hermeneutical imprint. Phenomena can manifest themselves as objects or as events, so the gifted would come from technology if it manifests itself as a saturated phenomenon. It is hypothesized that postphenomenology and the phenomenology of donation can complement and enrich each other in the treatment of the phenomenon of technology, having Heideggerian work and hermeneutics as common ground.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Invisto
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21703/invisto.2024.07
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La fenomenicidad de la tecnología. Cruces entre la hermenéutica de lafacticidad, la postfenomenología y la fenomenología de la donación

Jonatan Gabriel Rossodivito
Invisto
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

La fenomenicidad de la tecnología. Cruces entre la hermenéutica de lafacticidad, la postfenomenología y la fenomenología de la donación

Jonatan Gabriel Rossodivito
article en

Abstract

In his phenomenological-hermeneutical work, Martin Heidegger allows us to think about the technological phenomenon through the existential of the useful (Zuhandenheit) but also according to the “imposition” (Gestell) of an alienating nature. This work exposes two reactions to the Heideggerian approach to technology. Don Ihde fuses phenomenology and pragmatism in postphenomenology, proposing a material hermeneutics in which the practical is a priority and technoscience, together with the doing of Homo Faber, configure subjectivity. On the other hand, Jean-Luc Marion proposes a counter-intentionality under the call-response structure, with a strong hermeneutical imprint. Phenomena can manifest themselves as objects or as events, so the gifted would come from technology if it manifests itself as a saturated phenomenon. It is hypothesized that postphenomenology and the phenomenology of donation can complement and enrich each other in the treatment of the phenomenon of technology, having Heideggerian work and hermeneutics as common ground.

InvistoVol. 1(1)
National University of Mar del Plata (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

La fenomenicidad de la tecnología. Cruces entre la hermenéutica de lafacticidad, la postfenomenología y la fenomenología de la donación — Jonatan Gabriel Rossodivito · Invisto (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS