A general comparison of directors and members of the National Assembly - Focusing on status and duties -

In that directors are elected by shareholders, are members of the board of directors, and exercise their authority as trustees of the company under a delegation agreement, they can be said to be similar to members of the National Assembly who are elected by the people, are members of the National Assembly, and exercise their authority as a state agency under a representative system. The status and obligations of directors toward the company and shareholders cannot be uniformly compared with those of members of the National Assembly toward the country and the people, but there are areas that should be treated the same or similarly, and even a rough comparison centered on status and obligations can be seen as suggestive in many areas.<br/> In terms of their status, directors are merely trustees for the company’s assets invested by shareholders, and they cannot be said to be directly in the position of trustees in their relationship with shareholders. This is basically the same in their relationship with members of the National Assembly and the people.<br/> In terms of their obligations, directors only bear a duty of loyalty to the company as trustees for the company’s assets invested by shareholders, who are members of the company, and in the process of judging the interests of the company, they consider the interests of shareholders as a whole. Likewise, it may be possible to recognize the status of a trustee for national assets that have become national assets through the taxes paid by citizens who are members of the country, but the National Assembly also directly bears obligations only to the country, and when making decisions that prioritize national interests, the interests of the people as a whole must also be considered. Meanwhile, it is necessary to discuss whether certain restrictions should be recognized for the immunity privilege of the National Assembly members.<br/> This study compared the status and duties of directors and members of the National Assembly to examine the implications, and also examined the imposition of directors’ duty of loyalty to shareholders, the interpretation and application of special interests, and the limitations on members of the National Assembly’s immunity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Han Yang Law Review
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35227/hylr.2025.5.36.2.185
Primary Topic
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A general comparison of directors and members of the National Assembly - Focusing on status and duties -

Keon-Do Park
Han Yang Law Review
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
article

A general comparison of directors and members of the National Assembly - Focusing on status and duties -

Keon-Do Park
article en

Abstract

In that directors are elected by shareholders, are members of the board of directors, and exercise their authority as trustees of the company under a delegation agreement, they can be said to be similar to members of the National Assembly who are elected by the people, are members of the National Assembly, and exercise their authority as a state agency under a representative system. The status and obligations of directors toward the company and shareholders cannot be uniformly compared with those of members of the National Assembly toward the country and the people, but there are areas that should be treated the same or similarly, and even a rough comparison centered on status and obligations can be seen as suggestive in many areas.<br/> In terms of their status, directors are merely trustees for the company’s assets invested by shareholders, and they cannot be said to be directly in the position of trustees in their relationship with shareholders. This is basically the same in their relationship with members of the National Assembly and the people.<br/> In terms of their obligations, directors only bear a duty of loyalty to the company as trustees for the company’s assets invested by shareholders, who are members of the company, and in the process of judging the interests of the company, they consider the interests of shareholders as a whole. Likewise, it may be possible to recognize the status of a trustee for national assets that have become national assets through the taxes paid by citizens who are members of the country, but the National Assembly also directly bears obligations only to the country, and when making decisions that prioritize national interests, the interests of the people as a whole must also be considered. Meanwhile, it is necessary to discuss whether certain restrictions should be recognized for the immunity privilege of the National Assembly members.<br/> This study compared the status and duties of directors and members of the National Assembly to examine the implications, and also examined the imposition of directors’ duty of loyalty to shareholders, the interpretation and application of special interests, and the limitations on members of the National Assembly’s immunity.

Han Yang Law ReviewVol. 36(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A general comparison of directors and members of the National Assembly - Focusing on status and duties - — Keon-Do Park · Han Yang Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS