Kompensācija par nemantisko aizskārumu kriminālprocesā un tās noteikšanas problemātika

In order to determine whether compensations to victims in criminal proceedings are fair, justified, and in accordance with criminal procedural regulations, a master’s thesis was developed with a primary focus on the regulatory framework concerning determining compensation for non-material damage and resulting damages in criminal proceedings. The research examined ninety court judgments, from which fifty were selected for in-depth analysis and evaluation of the circumstances determining compensation for non-material harm. As a result, deficiencies in determining compensation for non-material damage and violations existing in compensation determination practice were identified. The author provided suggestions for addressing these issues, offering solutions for improving the compensation institution.

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.83.55
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kompensācija par nemantisko aizskārumu kriminālprocesā un tās noteikšanas problemātika

Legal Studies and Reforms
article

Kompensācija par nemantisko aizskārumu kriminālprocesā un tās noteikšanas problemātika

article en

Abstract

In order to determine whether compensations to victims in criminal proceedings are fair, justified, and in accordance with criminal procedural regulations, a master’s thesis was developed with a primary focus on the regulatory framework concerning determining compensation for non-material damage and resulting damages in criminal proceedings. The research examined ninety court judgments, from which fifty were selected for in-depth analysis and evaluation of the circumstances determining compensation for non-material harm. As a result, deficiencies in determining compensation for non-material damage and violations existing in compensation determination practice were identified. The author provided suggestions for addressing these issues, offering solutions for improving the compensation institution.

Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Legal Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kompensācija par nemantisko aizskārumu kriminālprocesā un tās noteikšanas problemātika · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS