Pārrobežu laulības šķiršana Eiropas Savienībā mijiedarbībā ar tiesību uz laulības šķiršanu kā patstāvīgu cilvēktiesību neatzīšanu Eiropā

The Rome III Regulation contains unified conflict-of-laws rules on the law applicable to cross-border divorce. However, there are significant differences in the legal framework of divorce between EU Member States. Besides, the right to divorce is not recognised as an independent human right in Europe, protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, and the right to divorce is not included in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights either. In this article, the author examines the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in Johnston and others v. Ireland, Babiarz v. Poland and Piotrowski v. Poland and analyses issues that the application of Rome III in cross-border divorce cases may raise in interaction with the failure to recognise the right to divorce as an independent human right.

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.83.03
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pārrobežu laulības šķiršana Eiropas Savienībā mijiedarbībā ar tiesību uz laulības šķiršanu kā patstāvīgu cilvēktiesību neatzīšanu Eiropā

Legal Studies and Reforms
article

Pārrobežu laulības šķiršana Eiropas Savienībā mijiedarbībā ar tiesību uz laulības šķiršanu kā patstāvīgu cilvēktiesību neatzīšanu Eiropā

article en

Abstract

The Rome III Regulation contains unified conflict-of-laws rules on the law applicable to cross-border divorce. However, there are significant differences in the legal framework of divorce between EU Member States. Besides, the right to divorce is not recognised as an independent human right in Europe, protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, and the right to divorce is not included in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights either. In this article, the author examines the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in Johnston and others v. Ireland, Babiarz v. Poland and Piotrowski v. Poland and analyses issues that the application of Rome III in cross-border divorce cases may raise in interaction with the failure to recognise the right to divorce as an independent human right.

Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Legal Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pārrobežu laulības šķiršana Eiropas Savienībā mijiedarbībā ar tiesību uz laulības šķiršanu kā patstāvīgu cilvēktiesību neatzīšanu Eiropā · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS