Juridiskā siloģisma funkcija tiesas nolēmumu argumentācijas veidošanā

In the discourse of the theory of law, there are several different kinds of legal syllogisms. The aim of this paper is to discover the functions of these different legal syllogisms and determine which functions are useful in forming the reasoning of court rulings. The author discovered thirteen different functions, but only eleven of them are relevant in forming court rulings that can be sufficiently justified.

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.83.24
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juridiskā siloģisma funkcija tiesas nolēmumu argumentācijas veidošanā

European and International Law Studies
article

Juridiskā siloģisma funkcija tiesas nolēmumu argumentācijas veidošanā

article en

Abstract

In the discourse of the theory of law, there are several different kinds of legal syllogisms. The aim of this paper is to discover the functions of these different legal syllogisms and determine which functions are useful in forming the reasoning of court rulings. The author discovered thirteen different functions, but only eleven of them are relevant in forming court rulings that can be sufficiently justified.

Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Juridiskā siloģisma funkcija tiesas nolēmumu argumentācijas veidošanā · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS