Comparing academic motivation across disciplines in a Vietnamese university context

This study examines differences in academic motivation among undergraduates from three academic majors—Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and English Studies—at a Vietnamese university. Based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the study employed the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) to measure intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation across a sample of 126 students. One-way ANOVA indicated significant differences in intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among the majors. Students in technical disciplines reported higher motivation levels than English majors. Amotivation showed no significant differences. Post-hoc tests confirmed that English majors scored significantly lower in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. Findings highlight the influence of academic discipline on motivation and suggest the need for tailored educational interventions to enhance student engagement. Implications for curriculum design and student support are discussed in the context of Vietnamese higher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Literacy and Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/27891607.2025.v5.i1f.299
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing academic motivation across disciplines in a Vietnamese university context

Hoàng Thị Thắm
International Journal of Literacy and Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Comparing academic motivation across disciplines in a Vietnamese university context

Hoàng Thị Thắm
article en

Abstract

This study examines differences in academic motivation among undergraduates from three academic majors—Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and English Studies—at a Vietnamese university. Based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the study employed the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) to measure intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation across a sample of 126 students. One-way ANOVA indicated significant differences in intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among the majors. Students in technical disciplines reported higher motivation levels than English majors. Amotivation showed no significant differences. Post-hoc tests confirmed that English majors scored significantly lower in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. Findings highlight the influence of academic discipline on motivation and suggest the need for tailored educational interventions to enhance student engagement. Implications for curriculum design and student support are discussed in the context of Vietnamese higher education.

International Journal of Literacy and EducationVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing academic motivation across disciplines in a Vietnamese university context — Hoàng Thị Thắm · International Journal of Literacy and Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS