Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu
What are the constraints on agreement, and how does it interact with other syntactic operations? Recent studies suggest that syntactic dependencies are tier-based strictly local (TSL) over Minimalist Grammar derivation trees, a computationally restrictive model which closely fits many aspects of the formal typology (Graf 2022, Hanson 2025). Using this framework, I provide an analysis of upward complementizer agreement in Lubukusu (Diercks 2013), and show that it correctly predicts lack of agreement with hyperraised subjects without any additional assumptions. I argue further that the phenomenon should be understood as a kind of syntactic counterfeeding, which together with the existence of feeding, bleeding, and counterbleeding, suggests the need for a syntactic framework which can handle variable operation ordering.
Authors
- Kenneth Hanson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4243-3976)
Institutions
- Stony Brook University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
- Published
- 2025-06-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5960
- Primary Topic
- Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Stony Brook University