Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu

What are the constraints on agreement, and how does it interact with other syntactic operations? Recent studies suggest that syntactic dependencies are tier-based strictly local (TSL) over Minimalist Grammar derivation trees, a computationally restrictive model which closely fits many aspects of the formal typology (Graf 2022, Hanson 2025). Using this framework, I provide an analysis of upward complementizer agreement in Lubukusu (Diercks 2013), and show that it correctly predicts lack of agreement with hyperraised subjects without any additional assumptions. I argue further that the phenomenon should be understood as a kind of syntactic counterfeeding, which together with the existence of feeding, bleeding, and counterbleeding, suggests the need for a syntactic framework which can handle variable operation ordering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5960
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu

Kenneth Hanson
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu

Kenneth Hanson
article en

Abstract

What are the constraints on agreement, and how does it interact with other syntactic operations? Recent studies suggest that syntactic dependencies are tier-based strictly local (TSL) over Minimalist Grammar derivation trees, a computationally restrictive model which closely fits many aspects of the formal typology (Graf 2022, Hanson 2025). Using this framework, I provide an analysis of upward complementizer agreement in Lubukusu (Diercks 2013), and show that it correctly predicts lack of agreement with hyperraised subjects without any additional assumptions. I argue further that the phenomenon should be understood as a kind of syntactic counterfeeding, which together with the existence of feeding, bleeding, and counterbleeding, suggests the need for a syntactic framework which can handle variable operation ordering.

Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of AmericaVol. 10(1)
Stony Brook University (US)
National Science Foundation, Stony Brook University
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.