Enhancing net zero decarbonization strategies: a comparative analysis with the analytic hierarchy process

Abstract This paper comprehensively analyses decarbonization decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). With a pressing global mandate to achieve net-zero carbon emissions, systematic approaches are essential for effectively selecting and prioritizing decarbonization strategies. Applying AHP, this study evaluates and ranks strategies based on key criteria. Each criterion’s weighted priority reflects its significance in decision-making, highlighting the dominance of Social Equity and Environmental Impact in prioritizing decarbonization strategies. The findings underscore the real-world applicability of the AHP framework, providing policymakers and stakeholders with a structured decision-making tool to prioritize actions that balance environmental sustainability, economic feasibility, and social equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctaf023
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing net zero decarbonization strategies: a comparative analysis with the analytic hierarchy process

Kottala Sri Yogi, M. Mehdi Shafieezadeh, Tarak Vora, Ashish Kumar Singh et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
article

Enhancing net zero decarbonization strategies: a comparative analysis with the analytic hierarchy process

Kottala Sri Yogi, M. Mehdi Shafieezadeh, Tarak Vora, Ashish Kumar Singh, Farag M. A. Altalbawy, Amarjit Singh Dhaliwal, Amjad Ali, I.B. Sapaev, Ahmad Alkhayyat, Arasu Raman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper comprehensively analyses decarbonization decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). With a pressing global mandate to achieve net-zero carbon emissions, systematic approaches are essential for effectively selecting and prioritizing decarbonization strategies. Applying AHP, this study evaluates and ranks strategies based on key criteria. Each criterion’s weighted priority reflects its significance in decision-making, highlighting the dominance of Social Equity and Environmental Impact in prioritizing decarbonization strategies. The findings underscore the real-world applicability of the AHP framework, providing policymakers and stakeholders with a structured decision-making tool to prioritize actions that balance environmental sustainability, economic feasibility, and social equity.

International Journal of Low-Carbon TechnologiesVol. 20
Chandigarh University (IN), INTI International University (MY), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of Babylon (IQ), Moscow Power Engineering Institute (RU), Symbiosis International University (IN), NIMS University (IN), Western Caspian University (AZ), Iraqi University (IQ), Marwadi University (IN), Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (UZ), Institute of Business Management (PK), Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Tabuk (SA), Islamic Azad University of Shiraz (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.