Enhancing Research Productivity Through Agentic AI Workflows: A Multi-Agent Framework for Intelligent Research Assistance

The exponential growth of academic literature presents significant challenges for researchers in conducting comprehensive literature reviews and maintaining current knowledge in their fields. Traditional research methodologies often prove inadequate for processing the vast volumes of information available across multiple databases and repositories (Chen et al., 2024; Rodriguez & Kim, 2023). This study introduces a novel agentic artificial intelligence framework designed to enhance research productivity through intelligent automation of literature discovery and report generation processes. The proposed system employs a dual-agent architecture comprising a specialized Search Agent responsible for multi-database literature discovery and source quality assessment, and a Drafting Agent focused on content analysis, synthesis, and coherent report generation (Thompson & Williams, 2024). Through empirical evaluation involving 150 research tasks across 15 academic domains, our framework demonstrated substantial improvements over traditional research methods: 55% reduction in time requirements (from 18.7 to 8.3 days average), 23% improvement in source coverage (from 77% to 100%), 60% reduction in cost per literature review (from ,847 to ,139), and 28% increase in user satisfaction scores (from 3.2 to 4.1 out of 5.0). The system maintains high quality standards with an average quality score of 4.2/5.0 compared to 3.9/5.0 for traditional methods (Anderson et al., 2024). Domain-specific analysis reveals varying effectiveness, with interdisciplinary research showing the highest performance gains (68% time savings, 91% user satisfaction), followed by STEM disciplines (62% time savings, 94% satisfaction). The framework addresses critical challenges in academic research including information overload, source verification, and synthesis complexity while maintaining scholarly rigor and citation accuracy (Martinez & Lee, 2023). Implementation results demonstrate the practical viability of agentic AI systems in academic research contexts, providing a scalable solution for institutions seeking to enhance research productivity and quality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2025.v10i06.004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Research Productivity Through Agentic AI Workflows: A Multi-Agent Framework for Intelligent Research Assistance

Serageldeen Sultan, L. Sultan, Mona Kaddura
1 citations
Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology
Scientific Computing and Data Management
4.17
article

Enhancing Research Productivity Through Agentic AI Workflows: A Multi-Agent Framework for Intelligent Research Assistance

Serageldeen Sultan, L. Sultan, Mona Kaddura
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The exponential growth of academic literature presents significant challenges for researchers in conducting comprehensive literature reviews and maintaining current knowledge in their fields. Traditional research methodologies often prove inadequate for processing the vast volumes of information available across multiple databases and repositories (Chen et al., 2024; Rodriguez & Kim, 2023). This study introduces a novel agentic artificial intelligence framework designed to enhance research productivity through intelligent automation of literature discovery and report generation processes. The proposed system employs a dual-agent architecture comprising a specialized Search Agent responsible for multi-database literature discovery and source quality assessment, and a Drafting Agent focused on content analysis, synthesis, and coherent report generation (Thompson & Williams, 2024). Through empirical evaluation involving 150 research tasks across 15 academic domains, our framework demonstrated substantial improvements over traditional research methods: 55% reduction in time requirements (from 18.7 to 8.3 days average), 23% improvement in source coverage (from 77% to 100%), 60% reduction in cost per literature review (from ,847 to ,139), and 28% increase in user satisfaction scores (from 3.2 to 4.1 out of 5.0). The system maintains high quality standards with an average quality score of 4.2/5.0 compared to 3.9/5.0 for traditional methods (Anderson et al., 2024). Domain-specific analysis reveals varying effectiveness, with interdisciplinary research showing the highest performance gains (68% time savings, 91% user satisfaction), followed by STEM disciplines (62% time savings, 94% satisfaction). The framework addresses critical challenges in academic research including information overload, source verification, and synthesis complexity while maintaining scholarly rigor and citation accuracy (Martinez & Lee, 2023). Implementation results demonstrate the practical viability of agentic AI systems in academic research contexts, providing a scalable solution for institutions seeking to enhance research productivity and quality.

Saudi Journal of Engineering and TechnologyVol. 10(06)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.