The influence of average electron density assignment on dose accuracy in MR-guided radiotherapy of rectum cancer

To study the impact of assigning average electron density on the dose accuracy of patients in adapt to shape (ATS) workflow of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT). Ten rectum cancer patients, who underwent treatment with MRgRT, were included for this study. For each patient, 2 plans were created. The first plan, referred to as the average electron density (AVED) plan, was generated using bulk anatomical average density method based on anatomical contours derived from the CT image. The second plan, equivalent to the actual electron density (ACED) plan, was recalculated using the actual electron density while maintaining the same segment shapes and monitor units as the AVED plan. Consequently, the ACED plan represents the actual adaptive dose. Various parameters, including the dose conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), as well as the dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), were analyzed. Additionally, the dose verification of the ACED plans was conducted using an MR-compatible ArcCHECK phantom. The gamma passing rate of the ACED plan in comparison to the AVED plan was calculated using 3-dimensional gamma analysis software. In the ACED plan, compared with the AVED plan, the coverage of prescribed dose in PTV was significantly low (p < 0.05), with the difference of 2.11% and PTV exhibited poorer values for both the HI and CI (p < 0.05). Additionally, the V<sub>50</sub> of colon, mean dose of bladder, left femur and right femur were significantly low (p < 0.05) in the ACED plans. The gamma pass rates for ACED plans exceeded 90% (ArcCHECK vs TPS) under 2 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% criteria with a 10% dose threshold. Compared to AVED plans, ACED plans achieved average pass rates of 99.39% ± 0.34% and 97.92% ± 0.65%, respectively. When using average electron density for dose calculations in MRgRT of rectum cancer, it is essential to note that there can be discrepancies between the calculated and actual doses, particularly in homogeneity of PTV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical dosimetry
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2025.05.006
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of average electron density assignment on dose accuracy in MR-guided radiotherapy of rectum cancer

Yingjie Xu, Jianrong Dai, Xuejie Xie, Lingling Yan
Medical dosimetry
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

The influence of average electron density assignment on dose accuracy in MR-guided radiotherapy of rectum cancer

Yingjie Xu, Jianrong Dai, Xuejie Xie, Lingling Yan
article en

Abstract

To study the impact of assigning average electron density on the dose accuracy of patients in adapt to shape (ATS) workflow of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT). Ten rectum cancer patients, who underwent treatment with MRgRT, were included for this study. For each patient, 2 plans were created. The first plan, referred to as the average electron density (AVED) plan, was generated using bulk anatomical average density method based on anatomical contours derived from the CT image. The second plan, equivalent to the actual electron density (ACED) plan, was recalculated using the actual electron density while maintaining the same segment shapes and monitor units as the AVED plan. Consequently, the ACED plan represents the actual adaptive dose. Various parameters, including the dose conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), as well as the dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), were analyzed. Additionally, the dose verification of the ACED plans was conducted using an MR-compatible ArcCHECK phantom. The gamma passing rate of the ACED plan in comparison to the AVED plan was calculated using 3-dimensional gamma analysis software. In the ACED plan, compared with the AVED plan, the coverage of prescribed dose in PTV was significantly low (p < 0.05), with the difference of 2.11% and PTV exhibited poorer values for both the HI and CI (p < 0.05). Additionally, the V<sub>50</sub> of colon, mean dose of bladder, left femur and right femur were significantly low (p < 0.05) in the ACED plans. The gamma pass rates for ACED plans exceeded 90% (ArcCHECK vs TPS) under 2 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% criteria with a 10% dose threshold. Compared to AVED plans, ACED plans achieved average pass rates of 99.39% ± 0.34% and 97.92% ± 0.65%, respectively. When using average electron density for dose calculations in MRgRT of rectum cancer, it is essential to note that there can be discrepancies between the calculated and actual doses, particularly in homogeneity of PTV.

Medical dosimetryVol. 50(4)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Cancer Center (US)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.