Digitally Captured Signature solution errors revealed by calibration and testing: Two examples

Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions consist of a hardware and a software component. Even though technical characteristics are almost always provided by the manufacturer, the implementation of a given solution may include errors and should be subject to examination. Furthermore, the non-intuitive relation between the exercised force (in Newtons) and the assigned values (arbitrary Pressure Levels) for the Force Channel data, as found in the standard collection of biometric data X for the X axis position, Y for the Y axis position, F for the pressure sensor values, and T for time, makes DCS solutions more difficult for companies to provide any such test or information, making the calibration of the Force Channel data a necessary step. In this paper, we present two real case deployments that proved to be problematic after thorough examination, one on the software component and the other on the hardware component. These problems were communicated to the providers of the specific DCS solutions and were corrected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70100
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitally Captured Signature solution errors revealed by calibration and testing: Two examples

Nikolaos Kalantzis, Sarah Fieldhouse
Journal of Forensic Sciences
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
article

Digitally Captured Signature solution errors revealed by calibration and testing: Two examples

Nikolaos Kalantzis, Sarah Fieldhouse
article en

Abstract

Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions consist of a hardware and a software component. Even though technical characteristics are almost always provided by the manufacturer, the implementation of a given solution may include errors and should be subject to examination. Furthermore, the non-intuitive relation between the exercised force (in Newtons) and the assigned values (arbitrary Pressure Levels) for the Force Channel data, as found in the standard collection of biometric data X for the X axis position, Y for the Y axis position, F for the pressure sensor values, and T for time, makes DCS solutions more difficult for companies to provide any such test or information, making the calibration of the Force Channel data a necessary step. In this paper, we present two real case deployments that proved to be problematic after thorough examination, one on the software component and the other on the hardware component. These problems were communicated to the providers of the specific DCS solutions and were corrected.

Journal of Forensic SciencesVol. 70(5)
Technological Educational Institute of Piraeus (GR), University of Staffordshire (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.