Investigating the precision of hydrographic data by comparing the differences between multi-beam and single-beam echo-sounders (Case study: Bushehr Port in the Persian Gulf)

This study examines discrepancies between single-beam and multi-beam data at Bushehr Port, where multi-beam data were processed using mathematical models. Single-beam-derived depths from control points were then interpolated onto these surfaces and compared statistically. The analysis revealed an average depth difference of 0.03 m between the sensors, with a standard deviation of 0.08 m at a 98 % confidence interval, and a root mean square error of 0.21 m. The results confirm that multi-beam surveys with the IHO S-44 standard (Edition 6.1.0), achieve Special Order accuracy while reducing field operation time and costs, and providing more extensive seabed coverage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The International Hydrographic Review
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58440/ihr-31-1-n02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the precision of hydrographic data by comparing the differences between multi-beam and single-beam echo-sounders (Case study: Bushehr Port in the Persian Gulf)

Seyyed Mojtaba Zarei, Bahman Tajfirooz, Sevda Abadpour, Azadeh Kazemi et al.
1 citations
The International Hydrographic Review
Underwater Acoustics Research
1.79
article

Investigating the precision of hydrographic data by comparing the differences between multi-beam and single-beam echo-sounders (Case study: Bushehr Port in the Persian Gulf)

Seyyed Mojtaba Zarei, Bahman Tajfirooz, Sevda Abadpour, Azadeh Kazemi, Nader Pasandeh, Ali Kourosh Niya, Seyed Shahed Mosavat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines discrepancies between single-beam and multi-beam data at Bushehr Port, where multi-beam data were processed using mathematical models. Single-beam-derived depths from control points were then interpolated onto these surfaces and compared statistically. The analysis revealed an average depth difference of 0.03 m between the sensors, with a standard deviation of 0.08 m at a 98 % confidence interval, and a root mean square error of 0.21 m. The results confirm that multi-beam surveys with the IHO S-44 standard (Edition 6.1.0), achieve Special Order accuracy while reducing field operation time and costs, and providing more extensive seabed coverage.

The International Hydrographic ReviewVol. 31(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Underwater Acoustics Research
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.