Examining the impact of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL) on students’ attitudes and emotions toward learning in a university course

The flipped classroom, as an active learning methodology compared to the traditional classroom, has a significant impact on students’ learning experiences in higher education. However, its positive effects largely depend on students’ involvement, motivation, and personal characteristics. This research examines and compares the efficacy of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL), regarding students’ affective domain (attitude and emotion), in order to address challenges associated with active learning. The study, conducted over four academic years (2019/20 to 2022/23), used a quasi-experimental design and a quantitative survey of 242 pre-service teachers (PSTs). Results showed that PSTs in the G-FCL group significantly increased their positive attitudes toward learning compared to those in the FCL group. Additionally, students’ grades before the study (pre-grade) were found to be a relevant predictor of global attitudes. In terms of emotions, both methodologies had a significant influence, and pre-grade was again confirmed as a relevant predictor of global emotions. Multiple regression analysis of global attitudes and emotions, considering the studied variables (instruction methodology, pre-grade, educational background, and gender), indicated that these were significant predictors. However, there was no statistically significant difference related to PSTs’ gender. Overall, the findings reiterated that G-FCL was critical in promoting students’ affective domain, especially attitude, compared to FCL, although FCL itself had proved effects in previous research. In addition, it can be noted that employing blended and gamified learning methodologies will provide further benefits in the flipped classroom as an active learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Active Learning in Higher Education
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251347184
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the impact of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL) on students’ attitudes and emotions toward learning in a university course

Jin Su Jeong, David González‐Gómez
2 citations
Active Learning in Higher Education
Innovative Teaching Methods
17.85
article

Examining the impact of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL) on students’ attitudes and emotions toward learning in a university course

Jin Su Jeong, David González‐Gómez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The flipped classroom, as an active learning methodology compared to the traditional classroom, has a significant impact on students’ learning experiences in higher education. However, its positive effects largely depend on students’ involvement, motivation, and personal characteristics. This research examines and compares the efficacy of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL), regarding students’ affective domain (attitude and emotion), in order to address challenges associated with active learning. The study, conducted over four academic years (2019/20 to 2022/23), used a quasi-experimental design and a quantitative survey of 242 pre-service teachers (PSTs). Results showed that PSTs in the G-FCL group significantly increased their positive attitudes toward learning compared to those in the FCL group. Additionally, students’ grades before the study (pre-grade) were found to be a relevant predictor of global attitudes. In terms of emotions, both methodologies had a significant influence, and pre-grade was again confirmed as a relevant predictor of global emotions. Multiple regression analysis of global attitudes and emotions, considering the studied variables (instruction methodology, pre-grade, educational background, and gender), indicated that these were significant predictors. However, there was no statistically significant difference related to PSTs’ gender. Overall, the findings reiterated that G-FCL was critical in promoting students’ affective domain, especially attitude, compared to FCL, although FCL itself had proved effects in previous research. In addition, it can be noted that employing blended and gamified learning methodologies will provide further benefits in the flipped classroom as an active learning.

Active Learning in Higher Education
Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovative Teaching Methods
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining the impact of flipped classroom learning (FCL) and gamified-flipped classroom learning (G-FCL) on students’ attitudes and emotions toward learning in a university course — Jin Su Jeong, David González‐Gómez · Active Learning in Higher Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS