Why Is the Ceiling Silver? Uncovering the Role of Potential Appraisals in the Age–Promotion Relationship

ABSTRACT In this research, we set out to uncover why silver ceilings exist in organizations. Drawing on systematic–heuristic processing theory and recent psychological findings, we propose that “older” workers (aged 45 or more) are less likely to receive promotions because these decisions are based on potential appraisals, which are susceptible to managers’ heuristic (stereotypical) thinking. We test our hypotheses using two‐wave field data (Study 1) from a large financial organization and an experiment (Study 2) in which we manipulate age while holding all else equal. Both studies show that employee age has a negative effect on promotion likelihood and that this relationship is mediated by managers’ potential appraisals. Moreover, Study 2 also provides evidence for our theoretical rationale showing that the central effect is driven by managers’ heuristic processing and work‐related age stereotypes. Across both studies, our results provide consistent support for our hypothesis that appraisals of potential constitute a potent pathway via which managers’ age stereotypes can affect promotion decisions in organizations. We discuss theoretical contributions to the literature on workplace aging, employee appraisals, and personnel decisions, and formulate practical recommendations to help organizations tackle silver ceilings in the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Psychology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12692
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Is the Ceiling Silver? Uncovering the Role of Potential Appraisals in the Age–Promotion Relationship

Nicky Dries, Giverny De Boeck, Prisca Brosi, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra
Personnel Psychology
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Why Is the Ceiling Silver? Uncovering the Role of Potential Appraisals in the Age–Promotion Relationship

Nicky Dries, Giverny De Boeck, Prisca Brosi, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this research, we set out to uncover why silver ceilings exist in organizations. Drawing on systematic–heuristic processing theory and recent psychological findings, we propose that “older” workers (aged 45 or more) are less likely to receive promotions because these decisions are based on potential appraisals, which are susceptible to managers’ heuristic (stereotypical) thinking. We test our hypotheses using two‐wave field data (Study 1) from a large financial organization and an experiment (Study 2) in which we manipulate age while holding all else equal. Both studies show that employee age has a negative effect on promotion likelihood and that this relationship is mediated by managers’ potential appraisals. Moreover, Study 2 also provides evidence for our theoretical rationale showing that the central effect is driven by managers’ heuristic processing and work‐related age stereotypes. Across both studies, our results provide consistent support for our hypothesis that appraisals of potential constitute a potent pathway via which managers’ age stereotypes can affect promotion decisions in organizations. We discuss theoretical contributions to the literature on workplace aging, employee appraisals, and personnel decisions, and formulate practical recommendations to help organizations tackle silver ceilings in the workplace.

Personnel PsychologyVol. 78(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Kühne Logistics University (DE), Université de Lille (FR), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Lille Économie Management (FR), KU Leuven (BE)
University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Antwerpen
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.