Comparison of Various Feature Extractors and Classifiers in Wood Defect Detection

Detection of defects on wood during quality processes in the wood industry is extremely important both economically and in terms of production and use. In order to minimize the time and cost loss caused by products obtained with defective wood, manufacturers want to detect defects in wood early by applying quality control process. For this purpose, in this study, some experiments are carried out using texture analysis methods and machine learning classifiers to detect defective wood from wood images. The features of wood images in the dataset taken from literature are extracted separately with six texture feature extractors to detect defective wood. Features are classified using twelve different machine learning classifiers, primarily tree-based ensemble classifiers. Crossvalidation is used in all experiments to reduce classifier bias. The results obtained are presented comparatively in terms of each feature and classifier. The findings show that the most effective features in detecting defective wood are extracted by the Local Binary Pattern (LBP) method and the most effective classifier is the Random Forest Algorithm. An accuracy rate of 96.75 % is achieved with the LBP-RandomForestClassifier and, classification performance is also presented for each algorithm by creating hybrid feature vectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drvna industrija
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2025.0217
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Various Feature Extractors and Classifiers in Wood Defect Detection

Kazım Kılıç, İbrahim Alper Doğru, Uğur Özcan, Kenan KILIÇ
1 citations
Drvna industrija
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.24
article

Comparison of Various Feature Extractors and Classifiers in Wood Defect Detection

Kazım Kılıç, İbrahim Alper Doğru, Uğur Özcan, Kenan KILIÇ
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Detection of defects on wood during quality processes in the wood industry is extremely important both economically and in terms of production and use. In order to minimize the time and cost loss caused by products obtained with defective wood, manufacturers want to detect defects in wood early by applying quality control process. For this purpose, in this study, some experiments are carried out using texture analysis methods and machine learning classifiers to detect defective wood from wood images. The features of wood images in the dataset taken from literature are extracted separately with six texture feature extractors to detect defective wood. Features are classified using twelve different machine learning classifiers, primarily tree-based ensemble classifiers. Crossvalidation is used in all experiments to reduce classifier bias. The results obtained are presented comparatively in terms of each feature and classifier. The findings show that the most effective features in detecting defective wood are extracted by the Local Binary Pattern (LBP) method and the most effective classifier is the Random Forest Algorithm. An accuracy rate of 96.75 % is achieved with the LBP-RandomForestClassifier and, classification performance is also presented for each algorithm by creating hybrid feature vectors.

Drvna industrijaVol. 76(2)
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Gazi Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.