Discourse Surrounding the Recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden

This article employs inductive discourse analysis to examine the discussion surrounding the recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden. Although multifaceted in terms of framing, most parliamentary initiatives tend to focalise Elfdalian’s qualities as a language. In contrast, local advocates see recognition as empowering revitalisation efforts, addressing historical injustices, celebrating heritage, and diversifying funding opportunities. Governmental communications cite findings of the specialist minority committee’s 1997 report and class Elfdalian as a folkmål. Conflict between discourses appears where the legally undefined term folkmål enters and obscures the language discussion. Whereas the government sees integration into the public and administrative spheres as integral to recognition, local advocates reject this legal protection. The article concludes that working with a unified terminology would facilitate the discussion and outlines potential avenues for recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53779/wiko2006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse Surrounding the Recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden

Willem Adriaan Cornelis Koen
1 citations
Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe
Linguistics and language evolution
10.42
article

Discourse Surrounding the Recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden

Willem Adriaan Cornelis Koen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article employs inductive discourse analysis to examine the discussion surrounding the recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden. Although multifaceted in terms of framing, most parliamentary initiatives tend to focalise Elfdalian’s qualities as a language. In contrast, local advocates see recognition as empowering revitalisation efforts, addressing historical injustices, celebrating heritage, and diversifying funding opportunities. Governmental communications cite findings of the specialist minority committee’s 1997 report and class Elfdalian as a folkmål. Conflict between discourses appears where the legally undefined term folkmål enters and obscures the language discussion. Whereas the government sees integration into the public and administrative spheres as integral to recognition, local advocates reject this legal protection. The article concludes that working with a unified terminology would facilitate the discussion and outlines potential avenues for recognition.

Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in EuropeVol. 24(2)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Linguistics and language evolution
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discourse Surrounding the Recognition of Elfdalian in Sweden — Willem Adriaan Cornelis Koen · Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS