Firms’ Coalitions, Demand Systems and Asymmetric Prices

We extend Deneckere and Davidson’s model on firms’ incentives to form coalitions to predict which firms are more likely to enter a coalition. In Deneckere and Davidson, all firms have the same incentives to enter a coalition because they are all symmetric and therefore choose symmetric prices. We modify their demand specification to include different cross-price elasticities. With this, we can generate market equilibria where firms have different prices, and therefore different incentives to enter a coalition. Our modified model can inform the construction and estimation of empirical models of coalitions and price formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical Economics Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2025.153043
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firms’ Coalitions, Demand Systems and Asymmetric Prices

Armando J. Garcia Pires, Frode André Skjeret
Theoretical Economics Letters
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Firms’ Coalitions, Demand Systems and Asymmetric Prices

Armando J. Garcia Pires, Frode André Skjeret
article en

Abstract

We extend Deneckere and Davidson’s model on firms’ incentives to form coalitions to predict which firms are more likely to enter a coalition. In Deneckere and Davidson, all firms have the same incentives to enter a coalition because they are all symmetric and therefore choose symmetric prices. We modify their demand specification to include different cross-price elasticities. With this, we can generate market equilibria where firms have different prices, and therefore different incentives to enter a coalition. Our modified model can inform the construction and estimation of empirical models of coalitions and price formation.

Theoretical Economics LettersVol. 15(03)
Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.