Who Carries the Responsibility for Health Care Carbon Reduction?

Policy-makers, doctors, organizations, and academics who are persuaded that health care decarbonization is an ethical mandate are grappling with ethical and effective implementation of measures to support this goal. Health care carbon-mitigation strategies (both proposed and potential) at individual, regional (city, state, or council), national, and international levels have already been analyzed to different degrees; however, a comparative analysis of strategies at each of these levels that takes into account bioethical issues such as autonomy, responsibility, and shared decision-making has not previously been conducted (though some analysis between national and international efforts has occurred). This essay offers a comparative analysis of the ethical aspects of health care carbon reduction across these levels, including considerations of responsibility and of the potential for efforts at each level to actually impact climate change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Hastings Center Report
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.5008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Carries the Responsibility for Health Care Carbon Reduction?

Gabrielle Samuel, Cristina Richie
2 citations
The Hastings Center Report
Climate Change and Health Impacts
2.40
article

Who Carries the Responsibility for Health Care Carbon Reduction?

Gabrielle Samuel, Cristina Richie
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Policy-makers, doctors, organizations, and academics who are persuaded that health care decarbonization is an ethical mandate are grappling with ethical and effective implementation of measures to support this goal. Health care carbon-mitigation strategies (both proposed and potential) at individual, regional (city, state, or council), national, and international levels have already been analyzed to different degrees; however, a comparative analysis of strategies at each of these levels that takes into account bioethical issues such as autonomy, responsibility, and shared decision-making has not previously been conducted (though some analysis between national and international efforts has occurred). This essay offers a comparative analysis of the ethical aspects of health care carbon reduction across these levels, including considerations of responsibility and of the potential for efforts at each level to actually impact climate change.

The Hastings Center ReportVol. 55(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Carries the Responsibility for Health Care Carbon Reduction? — Gabrielle Samuel, Cristina Richie · The Hastings Center Report (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS