Sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical characteristics and their associations with mortality among All of Us participants compared with the United States general population

The large and diverse All of Us Research Program offers tremendous opportunities for health research. However, results may not be generalizable to the US population due to the program's targeted recruitment efforts. We compared All of Us participants to those from the nationally representative continuous 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with respect to overall mortality rates; the distribution of sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical characteristics; the association of each characteristic with mortality estimated using Cox proportional hazards models; and population attributable fractions (PAFs) for each characteristic and mortality. All of Us participants were older, less likely to be non-Hispanic White, had more years of education, and had a higher prevalence of major chronic conditions than NHANES. Mortality rates were generally lower for All of Us participants, especially at older ages. The direction of associations in All of Us and NHANES matched for almost all comparisons but differed in magnitude for some conditions, primarily clinical diagnoses. PAFs were generally higher in All of Us. Predictors of mortality in All of Us do not consistently generalize to the US population. Analytical approaches are needed to address nonrepresentativeness and mitigate potential biases associated with the selection into the All of Us cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf118
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical characteristics and their associations with mortality among All of Us participants compared with the United States general population

M. Maria Glymour, Anna C. Pederson, Minhyuk Choi, Andrew Stokes et al.
5 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
14.08
article

Sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical characteristics and their associations with mortality among All of Us participants compared with the United States general population

M. Maria Glymour, Anna C. Pederson, Minhyuk Choi, Andrew Stokes, Ruijia Chen, Peter Buto, Erin L. Ferguson, Jingxuan Wang, Deborah Blacker
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The large and diverse All of Us Research Program offers tremendous opportunities for health research. However, results may not be generalizable to the US population due to the program's targeted recruitment efforts. We compared All of Us participants to those from the nationally representative continuous 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with respect to overall mortality rates; the distribution of sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical characteristics; the association of each characteristic with mortality estimated using Cox proportional hazards models; and population attributable fractions (PAFs) for each characteristic and mortality. All of Us participants were older, less likely to be non-Hispanic White, had more years of education, and had a higher prevalence of major chronic conditions than NHANES. Mortality rates were generally lower for All of Us participants, especially at older ages. The direction of associations in All of Us and NHANES matched for almost all comparisons but differed in magnitude for some conditions, primarily clinical diagnoses. PAFs were generally higher in All of Us. Predictors of mortality in All of Us do not consistently generalize to the US population. Analytical approaches are needed to address nonrepresentativeness and mitigate potential biases associated with the selection into the All of Us cohort.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(9)
Boston University (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.