Detecting Deception: A Comparative Study of CNN Approaches for Deepfake Image Detection

The exponential growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has given rise to deepfake images, which present a major impact on digital safety, mistaken identity, and the spread of fake information. Due to their highly realistic nature, detecting deepfakes has become a major challenge, highlighting the critical need for robust detection systems. This research investigates the performance of nine advanced Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures, namely: Custom CNN, ResNet50, VGG16, InceptionV3, DenseNet, MobileNetV2, XceptionNet, MesoNet, and InceptionResNetV2 which were used to detect deepfakes. To evaluate the effectiveness of the above CNN architectures, two large-scale image datasets were used: the Real & Deepfake Dataset and the 140K Real and Fake Faces Dataset. These datasets include more than 2,00,000 real and fake images. The training was done using a GPU to increase the speed and accuracy of the models. Among all the models, the Custom CNN provided the best results, reaching 99% accuracy on the Real & Deepfake Dataset and 98% on the 140K dataset. ResNet50, DenseNet, and InceptionV3 also performed very well, each scoring above 90% accuracy in both datasets. Other models like VGG16, MobileNetV2, XceptionNet, and InceptionResNetV2 also showed strong results, proving they are useful for deepfake detection. This analysis study aims to identify the most efficient and accurate CNN architecture for image-based deepfake detection, ensuring digital content safety, and identifying the fastest model for real-time deepfake detection in future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/rmkmate64874.2025.11042380
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Deception: A Comparative Study of CNN Approaches for Deepfake Image Detection

S Rajalakshmi, M. Nithish, P. Thiyagarajan
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Detecting Deception: A Comparative Study of CNN Approaches for Deepfake Image Detection

S Rajalakshmi, M. Nithish, P. Thiyagarajan
article en

Abstract

The exponential growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has given rise to deepfake images, which present a major impact on digital safety, mistaken identity, and the spread of fake information. Due to their highly realistic nature, detecting deepfakes has become a major challenge, highlighting the critical need for robust detection systems. This research investigates the performance of nine advanced Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures, namely: Custom CNN, ResNet50, VGG16, InceptionV3, DenseNet, MobileNetV2, XceptionNet, MesoNet, and InceptionResNetV2 which were used to detect deepfakes. To evaluate the effectiveness of the above CNN architectures, two large-scale image datasets were used: the Real & Deepfake Dataset and the 140K Real and Fake Faces Dataset. These datasets include more than 2,00,000 real and fake images. The training was done using a GPU to increase the speed and accuracy of the models. Among all the models, the Custom CNN provided the best results, reaching 99% accuracy on the Real & Deepfake Dataset and 98% on the 140K dataset. ResNet50, DenseNet, and InceptionV3 also performed very well, each scoring above 90% accuracy in both datasets. Other models like VGG16, MobileNetV2, XceptionNet, and InceptionResNetV2 also showed strong results, proving they are useful for deepfake detection. This analysis study aims to identify the most efficient and accurate CNN architecture for image-based deepfake detection, ensuring digital content safety, and identifying the fastest model for real-time deepfake detection in future applications.

Central University of Tamil Nadu (IN), Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.