A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pure Hyaluronic Acid to the Hyaluronic Acid–Calcium Hydroxylapatite Combination for Temporal Volumization

Abstract Background Hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) are commonly used for facial volumization, with HA offering hydration and reversibility, whereas CaHA provides structural support and collagen biostimulation. Recently, a combination of HA and CaHA has been proposed to enhance both immediate volumization and long-term tissue remodeling. However, its efficacy for volume retention remains unclear. Objectives In this study, the authors aim to compare the volumetric retention and clinical outcomes of HA alone vs a manually prepared HA–CaHA mixture in the temporal region over a 90-day follow-up. Methods A randomized controlled trial included 20 patients (40 hemifaces) treated with either 0.5 mL of HA alone (G1) or a 40% HA and 60% CaHA mixture (G2). Fillers were injected subcutaneously using a 22 G cannula with a fan technique. Volumetric changes were assessed through 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry, and the Allergan Temple Scale (ATS) evaluated qualitative outcomes. Results Both groups showed significant ATS score improvements over time (P < .001), but volumetric analysis demonstrated greater retention in G1 (0.231 ± 0.255 mL) compared with G2 (0.028 ± 0.135 mL, P = .016). Conclusions The hypothesized synergy of the HA–CaHA combination was not observed. HA alone provided superior long-term volumization, suggesting that manual HA–CaHA mixing may alter filler performance. Further studies should explore premixed formulations and optimize treatment protocols. Level of Evidence: 2 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf076
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pure Hyaluronic Acid to the Hyaluronic Acid–Calcium Hydroxylapatite Combination for Temporal Volumization

Pietra Roschel, Victor Ricardo Manuel Muñoz-Lora, Thiago Rhangel Gomes Teixeira, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima et al.
1 citations
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
article

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pure Hyaluronic Acid to the Hyaluronic Acid–Calcium Hydroxylapatite Combination for Temporal Volumization

Pietra Roschel, Victor Ricardo Manuel Muñoz-Lora, Thiago Rhangel Gomes Teixeira, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Samantha Vitale, Marcelo Germani, Danielle da Silva Dias, Ana C N Carnevali, Adriana Marques Geroldo, Helem Haysahida
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) are commonly used for facial volumization, with HA offering hydration and reversibility, whereas CaHA provides structural support and collagen biostimulation. Recently, a combination of HA and CaHA has been proposed to enhance both immediate volumization and long-term tissue remodeling. However, its efficacy for volume retention remains unclear. Objectives In this study, the authors aim to compare the volumetric retention and clinical outcomes of HA alone vs a manually prepared HA–CaHA mixture in the temporal region over a 90-day follow-up. Methods A randomized controlled trial included 20 patients (40 hemifaces) treated with either 0.5 mL of HA alone (G1) or a 40% HA and 60% CaHA mixture (G2). Fillers were injected subcutaneously using a 22 G cannula with a fan technique. Volumetric changes were assessed through 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry, and the Allergan Temple Scale (ATS) evaluated qualitative outcomes. Results Both groups showed significant ATS score improvements over time (P < .001), but volumetric analysis demonstrated greater retention in G1 (0.231 ± 0.255 mL) compared with G2 (0.028 ± 0.135 mL, P = .016). Conclusions The hypothesized synergy of the HA–CaHA combination was not observed. HA alone provided superior long-term volumization, suggesting that manual HA–CaHA mixing may alter filler performance. Further studies should explore premixed formulations and optimize treatment protocols. Level of Evidence: 2 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open ForumVol. 7
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), College of Dental Surgeons of Hong Kong (CN), Guarulhos University (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.