Can Deep Learning Models Acquire Specialist Knowledge? Identifying Carotid Bruits in Type 2 Diabetes Using an Electronic Stethoscope

The present study explores the potential of artificial intelligence as a substitute for trained clinician identification of a carotid bruit from multiple auditory recordings from an electronic stethoscope in 98 people with type 2 diabetes, 48 of whom had a bruit. We employed various deep networks, including ResNet and VGGish, alongside tailor-made deep learning models for this purpose. Our findings indicated that in scenarios such as this, where the data show high variability and yet are limited, the highest model accuracy achieved was 67.8%. This suggests the inadequacy of AI-driven systems in accurately detecting carotid bruits in the present participant sample. Detailed results for each deep learning and machine learning approach are presented separately, and the dataset has been established as a benchmark for future studies. Given the complexity observed with the current data volume, additional studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3582938
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Deep Learning Models Acquire Specialist Knowledge? Identifying Carotid Bruits in Type 2 Diabetes Using an Electronic Stethoscope

Mohammed Bennamoun, Farid Boussaïd, Wendy A. Davis, Timothy M. E. Davis et al.
IEEE Access
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Can Deep Learning Models Acquire Specialist Knowledge? Identifying Carotid Bruits in Type 2 Diabetes Using an Electronic Stethoscope

Mohammed Bennamoun, Farid Boussaïd, Wendy A. Davis, Timothy M. E. Davis, Aref Miri Rekavandi
article en

Abstract

The present study explores the potential of artificial intelligence as a substitute for trained clinician identification of a carotid bruit from multiple auditory recordings from an electronic stethoscope in 98 people with type 2 diabetes, 48 of whom had a bruit. We employed various deep networks, including ResNet and VGGish, alongside tailor-made deep learning models for this purpose. Our findings indicated that in scenarios such as this, where the data show high variability and yet are limited, the highest model accuracy achieved was 67.8%. This suggests the inadequacy of AI-driven systems in accurately detecting carotid bruits in the present participant sample. Detailed results for each deep learning and machine learning approach are presented separately, and the dataset has been established as a benchmark for future studies. Given the complexity observed with the current data volume, additional studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
The University of Western Australia (AU), Fremantle Hospital (AU)
Diabetes Australia Research Trust, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.