Why We Can Thrive past Seventy‐Five: In Favor of Efforts to Extend the Human Lifespan

About ten years ago, Ezekiel Emanuel wrote an article extolling the benefits of dying at seventy-five. Since then, longevity and aging interest, research, and funding have exploded. Much of the public is supportive of aging biology research, and books on extending the human lifespan populate bestseller lists. However, the issue remains hotly debated, and many articles published in the lay press spin the research in a negative light. Yet, if we collect these arguments and address each one logically, we see that each implies untenable conclusions. More to the point, there are strong arguments that human health and life have fundamental value and that incremental gains in health and in years of life will benefit us. For both ethical and practical reasons, we should support aging research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Hastings Center Report
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.5007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why We Can Thrive past Seventy‐Five: In Favor of Efforts to Extend the Human Lifespan

Michael S. Ringel, Arthur L. Caplan, Carolyn B. Ringel
3 citations
The Hastings Center Report
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
2.86
article

Why We Can Thrive past Seventy‐Five: In Favor of Efforts to Extend the Human Lifespan

Michael S. Ringel, Arthur L. Caplan, Carolyn B. Ringel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

About ten years ago, Ezekiel Emanuel wrote an article extolling the benefits of dying at seventy-five. Since then, longevity and aging interest, research, and funding have exploded. Much of the public is supportive of aging biology research, and books on extending the human lifespan populate bestseller lists. However, the issue remains hotly debated, and many articles published in the lay press spin the research in a negative light. Yet, if we collect these arguments and address each one logically, we see that each implies untenable conclusions. More to the point, there are strong arguments that human health and life have fundamental value and that incremental gains in health and in years of life will benefit us. For both ethical and practical reasons, we should support aging research.

The Hastings Center ReportVol. 55(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.