Forecasting induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems using machine learning: challenges and opportunities

SUMMARY Induced seismicity poses a significant challenge to the safe and sustainable development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). This study explores the application of machine learning (ML) for forecasting cumulative seismic moment (CSM) of induced seismic events to evaluate reservoir stability in response to fluid injections. Using data from the Cooper Basin (Australia), the St1 Helsinki geothermal project (Finland), and a controlled laboratory injection experiment, we evaluate ML models that integrate catalogue and operational features with various frameworks. Results indicate that feature-rich models outperform simpler ones in complex seismic environments like the Cooper Basin and laboratory cases, where seismicity is promoted by earthquake interaction and fault reactivation. However, in scenarios like St1 Helsinki, with minimal event clustering, additional features offer limited predictive benefits. While ML models are promising, several challenges impede reliable forecasting, including data scarcity from operational wells, the extrapolation demands of cumulative output (i.e. CSM) and the difficulty of predicting abrupt CSM increases for large seismic events. Enhancing model robustness requires synthetic data augmentation and improved feature selection capable of capturing diverse reservoir dynamics. These advancements may enable more accurate near real-time forecasts of problematic induced seismic events, informing operational decisions to mitigate seismic risks while maximizing energy extraction, and hence offering a pathway for broader adoption of ML in renewable energy development and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf155
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems using machine learning: challenges and opportunities

Grzegorz Kwiatek, Sadegh Karimpouli, Patricia Martínez‐Garzón, Marco Bohnhoff et al.
5 citations
Geophysical Journal International
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
12.40
article

Forecasting induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems using machine learning: challenges and opportunities

Grzegorz Kwiatek, Sadegh Karimpouli, Patricia Martínez‐Garzón, Marco Bohnhoff, Danu Caus, Georg Dresen, Lei Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Induced seismicity poses a significant challenge to the safe and sustainable development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). This study explores the application of machine learning (ML) for forecasting cumulative seismic moment (CSM) of induced seismic events to evaluate reservoir stability in response to fluid injections. Using data from the Cooper Basin (Australia), the St1 Helsinki geothermal project (Finland), and a controlled laboratory injection experiment, we evaluate ML models that integrate catalogue and operational features with various frameworks. Results indicate that feature-rich models outperform simpler ones in complex seismic environments like the Cooper Basin and laboratory cases, where seismicity is promoted by earthquake interaction and fault reactivation. However, in scenarios like St1 Helsinki, with minimal event clustering, additional features offer limited predictive benefits. While ML models are promising, several challenges impede reliable forecasting, including data scarcity from operational wells, the extrapolation demands of cumulative output (i.e. CSM) and the difficulty of predicting abrupt CSM increases for large seismic events. Enhancing model robustness requires synthetic data augmentation and improved feature selection capable of capturing diverse reservoir dynamics. These advancements may enable more accurate near real-time forecasts of problematic induced seismic events, informing operational decisions to mitigate seismic risks while maximizing energy extraction, and hence offering a pathway for broader adoption of ML in renewable energy development and management.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 242(2)
German Climate Computing Centre (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.