Proving multiplicative relations for different lattice commitments

The BDLOP commitment of Baum et al. (SCN 2018) is the currently most efficient commitment scheme. Based on BDLOP commitment, Attema et al. in CRYPTO 2020 presented an efficient product proof in the ring Rq = ℤq[X]/(Xd + 1) where Xd + 1 splits into low-degree factors (ALS scheme). Their proof has only one garbage commitment besides the necessary opening proof and works in the case that all the messages are committed simultaneously using the same randomness r⃗. In this paper, we deal with the case where the messages involved in the multiplicative relation are committed using different randomnesses, and construct a parallel product proof and two sequential product proofs. Both of which still require need one additional garbage commitment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information and Computer Security
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijics.2025.146883
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proving multiplicative relations for different lattice commitments

Guifang Huang, Mengfan Wang, Lei Hu, Dong Fang
International Journal of Information and Computer Security
Advanced Algebra and Logic
article

Proving multiplicative relations for different lattice commitments

Guifang Huang, Mengfan Wang, Lei Hu, Dong Fang
article en

Abstract

The BDLOP commitment of Baum et al. (SCN 2018) is the currently most efficient commitment scheme. Based on BDLOP commitment, Attema et al. in CRYPTO 2020 presented an efficient product proof in the ring Rq = ℤq[X]/(Xd + 1) where Xd + 1 splits into low-degree factors (ALS scheme). Their proof has only one garbage commitment besides the necessary opening proof and works in the case that all the messages are committed simultaneously using the same randomness r⃗. In this paper, we deal with the case where the messages involved in the multiplicative relation are committed using different randomnesses, and construct a parallel product proof and two sequential product proofs. Both of which still require need one additional garbage commitment.

International Journal of Information and Computer SecurityVol. 27(2)
State Key Laboratory of Cryptology (CN), Institute of Information Engineering (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Advanced Algebra and Logic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proving multiplicative relations for different lattice commitments — Guifang Huang, Mengfan Wang, et al. · International Journal of Information and Computer Security (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS