Reliability of UPV on Compressive Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete

This study assesses the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) test's reliability in determining the quality and compressive strength of Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC). Various Fiber types—including Glass Fiber (GFRC), Polypropylene Fiber (PFRC), Carbon Fiber (CFRC), and Crimped Steel Fiber (CSFRC)—were included into concrete mixes, and their UPV measurements were taken at 7, 28, 90, and 360-day curing intervals. The results indicate a strong correlation between UPV and compressive strength, with CSFRC exhibiting the highest correlation (R² = 0.98), followed by CFRC (0.95) and PFRC (0.92). GFRC showed a slightly lower correlation (R² = 0.86) due to its greater heterogeneity. The study confirms that UPV serves as an effective non-destructive testing (NDT) method for evaluating concrete quality and estimating compressive strength. Additionally, the findings emphasize the significance of Fiber type, dosage, and curing conditions in enhancing the structural performance of FRC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Panamerican mathematical journal.
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/pmj.v35.i4s.5027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of UPV on Compressive Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete

Thiruthani Rukmangadha
2 citations
Panamerican mathematical journal.
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
article

Reliability of UPV on Compressive Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete

Thiruthani Rukmangadha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study assesses the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) test's reliability in determining the quality and compressive strength of Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC). Various Fiber types—including Glass Fiber (GFRC), Polypropylene Fiber (PFRC), Carbon Fiber (CFRC), and Crimped Steel Fiber (CSFRC)—were included into concrete mixes, and their UPV measurements were taken at 7, 28, 90, and 360-day curing intervals. The results indicate a strong correlation between UPV and compressive strength, with CSFRC exhibiting the highest correlation (R² = 0.98), followed by CFRC (0.95) and PFRC (0.92). GFRC showed a slightly lower correlation (R² = 0.86) due to its greater heterogeneity. The study confirms that UPV serves as an effective non-destructive testing (NDT) method for evaluating concrete quality and estimating compressive strength. Additionally, the findings emphasize the significance of Fiber type, dosage, and curing conditions in enhancing the structural performance of FRC.

Panamerican mathematical journal.Vol. 35(4s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.