Vicissitudes in the Prosecutor’s Work of Supporting State Prosecution in the Court of First Instance

The author studies various, both standard-legal and sudden, judicial situations arising during the consideration of criminal cases in the courts of first instance that make it harder for the prosecutors to ensure the further support of state prosecution. The author stresses the importance of preparatory work carried out by a public prosecutor before a court hearing, and underlines that the procedural opportunities of the prosecutor at the stage of judicial inquiry are highly limited. At the same time, the legislation offers the prosecutor a number of legal instruments whose effective implementation makes it possible to resolve conflict judicial situations in a timely manner. The author focuses on the importance of high-quality preliminary investigation and the supervision carried out by the prosecutors as part of the procedure of gathering, verifying and assessing evidence for the future objective consideration of a criminal case in court.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6122.2025.1.88-98
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vicissitudes in the Prosecutor’s Work of Supporting State Prosecution in the Court of First Instance

Anna Nedobor
Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings
International Law and Human Rights
article

Vicissitudes in the Prosecutor’s Work of Supporting State Prosecution in the Court of First Instance

Anna Nedobor
article en

Abstract

The author studies various, both standard-legal and sudden, judicial situations arising during the consideration of criminal cases in the courts of first instance that make it harder for the prosecutors to ensure the further support of state prosecution. The author stresses the importance of preparatory work carried out by a public prosecutor before a court hearing, and underlines that the procedural opportunities of the prosecutor at the stage of judicial inquiry are highly limited. At the same time, the legislation offers the prosecutor a number of legal instruments whose effective implementation makes it possible to resolve conflict judicial situations in a timely manner. The author focuses on the importance of high-quality preliminary investigation and the supervision carried out by the prosecutors as part of the procedure of gathering, verifying and assessing evidence for the future objective consideration of a criminal case in court.

Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings(1 (47))
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.