Effect of Middle Ear Prosthesis Diameter in Platinotomy and Partial Platinectomy on Hearing Gain: A Finite Element Study

This study investigates, for the first time, using finite element analysis (FEA), the differential impact of middle ear prosthesis diameter on hearing gain in two distinct surgical techniques: stapedotomy and partial stapedectomy. The model represented the cochlea as two fluid-filled straight channels separated by the basilar membrane and considered pistons of 0.4 mm and 0.6 mm diameters. The results demonstrated that in stapedotomy, a 0.6 mm diameter piston yielded a significantly better reduction in ABG (8.31 dB) compared to the 0.4 mm piston (10.67 dB), indicating improved hearing gain. Conversely, in partial stapedectomy, the smaller 0.4 mm piston was more effective, reducing ABG to 11.2 dB versus 12.12 dB with the larger piston. These findings highlight that the optimal prosthesis diameter varies according to surgical technique, emphasizing the need for tailored prosthesis selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Middle Ear Prosthesis Diameter in Platinotomy and Partial Platinectomy on Hearing Gain: A Finite Element Study

Vito Pontillo, Bartolomeo Trentadue, Nicola Quaranta, Mario Ceddia et al.
2 citations
Materials
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
3.70
article

Effect of Middle Ear Prosthesis Diameter in Platinotomy and Partial Platinectomy on Hearing Gain: A Finite Element Study

Vito Pontillo, Bartolomeo Trentadue, Nicola Quaranta, Mario Ceddia, Alessandra Murri, Alessandra Pantaleo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates, for the first time, using finite element analysis (FEA), the differential impact of middle ear prosthesis diameter on hearing gain in two distinct surgical techniques: stapedotomy and partial stapedectomy. The model represented the cochlea as two fluid-filled straight channels separated by the basilar membrane and considered pistons of 0.4 mm and 0.6 mm diameters. The results demonstrated that in stapedotomy, a 0.6 mm diameter piston yielded a significantly better reduction in ABG (8.31 dB) compared to the 0.4 mm piston (10.67 dB), indicating improved hearing gain. Conversely, in partial stapedectomy, the smaller 0.4 mm piston was more effective, reducing ABG to 11.2 dB versus 12.12 dB with the larger piston. These findings highlight that the optimal prosthesis diameter varies according to surgical technique, emphasizing the need for tailored prosthesis selection.

MaterialsVol. 18(13)
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Middle Ear Prosthesis Diameter in Platinotomy and Partial Platinectomy on Hearing Gain: A Finite Element Study — Vito Pontillo, Bartolomeo Trentadue, et al. · Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS