Whether Delegation or Assistance: Clarifying the Role of Tribunal Secretaries in ICC Arbitration

This paper explores the evolving role of tribunal secretaries in arbitration, with a focus on the landmark 2023 decision by the Belgian Supreme Court in Emek Insaat Sti Ltd and WTE Wassertechnik GmbH v. European Union. The court upheld the principle that secretaries may assist arbitrators in drafting awards under necessary supervision, provided that ultimate decision-making authority remains with the arbitrators. This decision aligns with international practices, reflecting a pragmatic balance between procedural efficiency and the integrity of arbitration. Analyzing key aspects of the case, including allegations of improper delegation, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) guidelines, and the court’s reasoning, this note highlights the safeguards necessary to preserve fairness and autonomy in arbitration. The implications of this ruling for global arbitration practices are discussed, emphasizing the need for greater clarity and harmonization of rules governing secretarial involvement in arbitral processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2025-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1375
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whether Delegation or Assistance: Clarifying the Role of Tribunal Secretaries in ICC Arbitration

Tariq K. Alhasan
2 citations
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
International Arbitration and Investment Law
4.45
article

Whether Delegation or Assistance: Clarifying the Role of Tribunal Secretaries in ICC Arbitration

Tariq K. Alhasan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the evolving role of tribunal secretaries in arbitration, with a focus on the landmark 2023 decision by the Belgian Supreme Court in Emek Insaat Sti Ltd and WTE Wassertechnik GmbH v. European Union. The court upheld the principle that secretaries may assist arbitrators in drafting awards under necessary supervision, provided that ultimate decision-making authority remains with the arbitrators. This decision aligns with international practices, reflecting a pragmatic balance between procedural efficiency and the integrity of arbitration. Analyzing key aspects of the case, including allegations of improper delegation, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) guidelines, and the court’s reasoning, this note highlights the safeguards necessary to preserve fairness and autonomy in arbitration. The implications of this ruling for global arbitration practices are discussed, emphasizing the need for greater clarity and harmonization of rules governing secretarial involvement in arbitral processes.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 17(4)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whether Delegation or Assistance: Clarifying the Role of Tribunal Secretaries in ICC Arbitration — Tariq K. Alhasan · Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS