Guilty (or invisible) materiality in everyday object relations?

In today’s context, demanding radical change even on the scale of our daily behaviour, this article builds on research into guilty materiality to better understand obstacles to changing our everyday material relations. “Guilty materiality“ refers to why materiality and material relations may be stigmatised, invisibilised, ignored and avoided. Daily material relations self-documented by 82 university-level design students provide the tangible basis for exploring and highlighting obstacles and ambiguities in daily-life artefact relations and their materiality. Our study focuses only on what is touched by the cohort, constituting a limited number of artefact encounters. The main analysed material is individual maps produced by students visualising their daily consumption habits. While the long-term aim of this research is to help identifying leverage points and action areas related to current practices and also mindsets, this paper also presents and explores the pertinence of the proposed methodology in this context. This research discusses, refines and adds to an existing list of triggers/influencing mechanisms that may act as obstacles to more environmentally-relevant everyday material relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54337/plate2025-10324
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guilty (or invisible) materiality in everyday object relations?

Clare Green, Stéphane Treilhou
1 citations
Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025)
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
article

Guilty (or invisible) materiality in everyday object relations?

Clare Green, Stéphane Treilhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In today’s context, demanding radical change even on the scale of our daily behaviour, this article builds on research into guilty materiality to better understand obstacles to changing our everyday material relations. “Guilty materiality“ refers to why materiality and material relations may be stigmatised, invisibilised, ignored and avoided. Daily material relations self-documented by 82 university-level design students provide the tangible basis for exploring and highlighting obstacles and ambiguities in daily-life artefact relations and their materiality. Our study focuses only on what is touched by the cohort, constituting a limited number of artefact encounters. The main analysed material is individual maps produced by students visualising their daily consumption habits. While the long-term aim of this research is to help identifying leverage points and action areas related to current practices and also mindsets, this paper also presents and explores the pertinence of the proposed methodology in this context. This research discusses, refines and adds to an existing list of triggers/influencing mechanisms that may act as obstacles to more environmentally-relevant everyday material relations.

Proceedings of the 6th Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference (PLATE2025)(6)
American University of Paris (FR), Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.