Comprehensive Evaluation of Simulation Performance of Nonmethane Hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and Oxygenated VOCs in China Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particularly oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs), critically influence ozone (O3) formation through free radical production. However, comprehensive evaluations of three-dimensional models in simulating both nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and OVOCs remain scarce, hindering O3 control strategies. This study systematically evaluates the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQv5.3.3) using hourly observations from 12 monitoring sites across China from 2017 to 2021. Results reveal that the model underestimates NMHCs by 22.0% and OVOCs by 43.7%, on average. Within the 14 abundant OVOC components, formaldehyde (HCHO) and ketones (PRD2) show overpredictions, while other OVOCs are underpredicted (4.7–94.2%), with simulated OVOC contributions to total VOCs (8.8–36.7%) being substantially lower than observations (16.6–60.8%). The model exhibits persistent underestimation in daytime concentrations across seasons and shows stronger declines in daytime concentrations from nighttime peaks compared to observations, which suggests overestimated atmospheric physical diffusion or vertical mixing processes. Residual error analysis after subtracting the simulation bias of NMHCs (primarily attributed to biases in emissions and atmospheric physical processes) highlights inadequate secondary chemical formation as a major bias source for OVOCs. Sensitivity experiments demonstrate that conventional adjustments to boundary layer and surface parametrization schemes, minimum turbulent diffusivity (Kzmin), or primary emissions failed to resolve daytime OVOCs underestimation. On the contrary, adjusting eddy diffusivity values during the day, the local vertical gradient in an unstable atmospheric state, and the yield coefficient for OVOCs chemical formation effectively enhance the simulated daytime concentrations of OVOCs and reduce the model bias. This study highlights that better descriptions of the atmospheric diffusion or vertical mixing processes during the daytime and the secondary chemical formations of OVOCs should be prioritized to improve the performance of NMHCs and OVOCs modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2025-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of Simulation Performance of Nonmethane Hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and Oxygenated VOCs in China Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model

Bin Zhao, Guiqian Tang, Fenfen Zhang, Qiuyan Du et al.
1 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of Simulation Performance of Nonmethane Hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and Oxygenated VOCs in China Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model

Bin Zhao, Guiqian Tang, Fenfen Zhang, Qiuyan Du, Bin Fang Yuan, Li Hong, Shengyue Li, Dejia Yin, Qing X. Li, Shuxiao Wang, Yibo Zhang, Min Shao, Jie Li, Chun Zhao, Yun Zhu, Yanlin Zhang, Qinwen Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particularly oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs), critically influence ozone (O3) formation through free radical production. However, comprehensive evaluations of three-dimensional models in simulating both nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and OVOCs remain scarce, hindering O3 control strategies. This study systematically evaluates the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQv5.3.3) using hourly observations from 12 monitoring sites across China from 2017 to 2021. Results reveal that the model underestimates NMHCs by 22.0% and OVOCs by 43.7%, on average. Within the 14 abundant OVOC components, formaldehyde (HCHO) and ketones (PRD2) show overpredictions, while other OVOCs are underpredicted (4.7–94.2%), with simulated OVOC contributions to total VOCs (8.8–36.7%) being substantially lower than observations (16.6–60.8%). The model exhibits persistent underestimation in daytime concentrations across seasons and shows stronger declines in daytime concentrations from nighttime peaks compared to observations, which suggests overestimated atmospheric physical diffusion or vertical mixing processes. Residual error analysis after subtracting the simulation bias of NMHCs (primarily attributed to biases in emissions and atmospheric physical processes) highlights inadequate secondary chemical formation as a major bias source for OVOCs. Sensitivity experiments demonstrate that conventional adjustments to boundary layer and surface parametrization schemes, minimum turbulent diffusivity (Kzmin), or primary emissions failed to resolve daytime OVOCs underestimation. On the contrary, adjusting eddy diffusivity values during the day, the local vertical gradient in an unstable atmospheric state, and the yield coefficient for OVOCs chemical formation effectively enhance the simulated daytime concentrations of OVOCs and reduce the model bias. This study highlights that better descriptions of the atmospheric diffusion or vertical mixing processes during the daytime and the secondary chemical formations of OVOCs should be prioritized to improve the performance of NMHCs and OVOCs modeling.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 2(7)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Fudan University (CN), Tyndall Centre (GB), Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, South China University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.