Exploring the Potential of Conversational <scp>AI</scp> for Assessing Second Language Oral Proficiency

Abstract Interactional Competence (IC) is an important subcomponent of oral proficiency, but many computer‐mediated oral English assessments fall short in assessing this construct mainly due to technological limitations. Spoken Dialogue Systems (SDSs) have shown promise in assessing L2 oral communication, yet further investigation is needed on their effectiveness in eliciting IC features in high‐stakes assessment contexts. This study is unique in that it analyzed both test takers' and an SDS's spoken discourse in human–computer interactions. Using an SDS to simulate an examiner in an IELTS Speaking task, the study explored how well the system mimicked human–human interaction and elicited IC features from test takers, focusing on the IC features documented in prior research. Thirty participants completed the SDS‐mediated test, with their performances rated by two trained raters. Semi‐structured interviews with 10 test takers were conducted following the assessment. The findings revealed that the SDS successfully elicited key IC features, which helped distinguish test takers at different proficiency levels, with reliable scoring across raters. Most test takers found the SDS competent, though some noted its limitations in nonverbal communication and conversational flow. These results suggest that SDSs have potential in oral proficiency assessments and provide valuable insights for refining SDS design to ensure reliable and valid assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TESOL Quarterly
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70003
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Potential of Conversational AI for Assessing Second Language Oral Proficiency

Jing Xu, Yasin Karatay
4 citations
TESOL Quarterly
Speech and dialogue systems
9.92
article

Exploring the Potential of Conversational AI for Assessing Second Language Oral Proficiency

Jing Xu, Yasin Karatay
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Interactional Competence (IC) is an important subcomponent of oral proficiency, but many computer‐mediated oral English assessments fall short in assessing this construct mainly due to technological limitations. Spoken Dialogue Systems (SDSs) have shown promise in assessing L2 oral communication, yet further investigation is needed on their effectiveness in eliciting IC features in high‐stakes assessment contexts. This study is unique in that it analyzed both test takers' and an SDS's spoken discourse in human–computer interactions. Using an SDS to simulate an examiner in an IELTS Speaking task, the study explored how well the system mimicked human–human interaction and elicited IC features from test takers, focusing on the IC features documented in prior research. Thirty participants completed the SDS‐mediated test, with their performances rated by two trained raters. Semi‐structured interviews with 10 test takers were conducted following the assessment. The findings revealed that the SDS successfully elicited key IC features, which helped distinguish test takers at different proficiency levels, with reliable scoring across raters. Most test takers found the SDS competent, though some noted its limitations in nonverbal communication and conversational flow. These results suggest that SDSs have potential in oral proficiency assessments and provide valuable insights for refining SDS design to ensure reliable and valid assessments.

TESOL QuarterlyVol. 59(S1)
Cambridge University Press (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Speech and dialogue systems
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.