Making sense of “big data”: Ten years of discourse around datafication

This article reconstructs the sociotechnical imaginaries of “Big Data” in Germany, South Africa, and the United States over 10 years. Our inquiry into the meaning-making undertaken on expansive datafication processes began from the observation that since its inception circa 2010, the buzz phrase “Big Data” has not only denoted a technology but has also gestured toward a vast array of ambitions and concerns that are reflective of values, economic perspectives, and cultural preoccupations. We use a frame analysis to investigate the unfolding journalistic discourse and discuss the sociotechnical imaginaries of Big Data in cross-national comparison. We found three dominant views that centered chiefly on rebuilding a datafied society, reviving datafied business, and retooling datafied surveillance. Despite substantial data scandals and whistleblower revelations, affirmative views prevailed. The trope of reviving datafied business was most often evoked from 2011 to 2013, but rebuilding a datafied society became the central perspective from 2014 onward. This order of prominence existed in the United States and Germany, whereas a business-oriented view predominated in South African media. Some publications in all three countries ran counter to the general trend but only exerted limited influence on the overall picture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251330181
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Big Data Technologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making sense of “big data”: Ten years of discourse around datafication

Christian Pentzold, Charlotte Knorr
4 citations
Big Data & Society
Big Data Technologies and Applications
16.68
article

Making sense of “big data”: Ten years of discourse around datafication

Christian Pentzold, Charlotte Knorr
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article reconstructs the sociotechnical imaginaries of “Big Data” in Germany, South Africa, and the United States over 10 years. Our inquiry into the meaning-making undertaken on expansive datafication processes began from the observation that since its inception circa 2010, the buzz phrase “Big Data” has not only denoted a technology but has also gestured toward a vast array of ambitions and concerns that are reflective of values, economic perspectives, and cultural preoccupations. We use a frame analysis to investigate the unfolding journalistic discourse and discuss the sociotechnical imaginaries of Big Data in cross-national comparison. We found three dominant views that centered chiefly on rebuilding a datafied society, reviving datafied business, and retooling datafied surveillance. Despite substantial data scandals and whistleblower revelations, affirmative views prevailed. The trope of reviving datafied business was most often evoked from 2011 to 2013, but rebuilding a datafied society became the central perspective from 2014 onward. This order of prominence existed in the United States and Germany, whereas a business-oriented view predominated in South African media. Some publications in all three countries ran counter to the general trend but only exerted limited influence on the overall picture.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 12(2)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Big Data Technologies and Applications
16.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.