Validity and Predictiveness of the 2 × 2 Model of L2 Self‐Guides: Revisiting the Relationship Between Motivation and L2 Communication

ABSTRACT The 2 × 2 model of L2 self‐guides, a motivational framework, contains four components—ideal L2 self/own, ideal L2 self/other, ought‐to L2 self/own, and ought‐to L2 self/other—which is considered more reflective of the continuity of learning motivation than traditional models. However, it has been validated only in a few studies and primarily in relation to more general measures of motivated behavior. The present study further evaluates the applicability of the L2 self‐guides model and examines how these self‐guides predict two interconnected operational constructs in L2 communication: willingness to communicate (WTC) and frequency of communication (FoC). An integrated questionnaire, developed from previous studies, was administered to 442 Chinese college students who were learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Multilevel validation and structural equation modeling were employed to assess the model's reliability, validity, and predictive effects. The results demonstrated strong discriminant validity for the self‐guides model. The ideal self/own was the strongest predictor of WTC and FoC, while the ought‐to self/own showed no significant effect. The ought‐to self/other and WTC both facilitated FoC, whereas the ideal self/other acted as an inhibitor. This study supports the generalizability of the L2 self‐guides model, providing insights into motivation theory and its role in L2 communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12797
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and Predictiveness of the 2 × 2 Model of L2 Self‐Guides: Revisiting the Relationship Between Motivation and L2 Communication

Tao Zeng, Wanting Wang
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Validity and Predictiveness of the 2 × 2 Model of L2 Self‐Guides: Revisiting the Relationship Between Motivation and L2 Communication

Tao Zeng, Wanting Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 2 × 2 model of L2 self‐guides, a motivational framework, contains four components—ideal L2 self/own, ideal L2 self/other, ought‐to L2 self/own, and ought‐to L2 self/other—which is considered more reflective of the continuity of learning motivation than traditional models. However, it has been validated only in a few studies and primarily in relation to more general measures of motivated behavior. The present study further evaluates the applicability of the L2 self‐guides model and examines how these self‐guides predict two interconnected operational constructs in L2 communication: willingness to communicate (WTC) and frequency of communication (FoC). An integrated questionnaire, developed from previous studies, was administered to 442 Chinese college students who were learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Multilevel validation and structural equation modeling were employed to assess the model's reliability, validity, and predictive effects. The results demonstrated strong discriminant validity for the self‐guides model. The ideal self/own was the strongest predictor of WTC and FoC, while the ought‐to self/own showed no significant effect. The ought‐to self/other and WTC both facilitated FoC, whereas the ideal self/other acted as an inhibitor. This study supports the generalizability of the L2 self‐guides model, providing insights into motivation theory and its role in L2 communication.

International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 36(1)
Hunan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.