Evaluation of 25G and 27G Quincke Spinal Needles for Post-Dural Puncture Headache Following Caesarean Section

Introduction: Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) remains a well-recognized health concern following a spinal anesthesia for a caesarean section (CS). To weigh the PDPH during CS, a comparison was made between 25G and 27G Quincke spinal needles. Methods: The prospective, single blind, cross sectional study study was conducted at the Centurion University, Vizianagaram, Vishakhapatnam, India,85 primiparous women aged 18-36 years were selected and classified as group 1 & 2, based on the type of needle used to receive anaesthesia for elective CS. The subjects were allocated to receive spinal anaesthesia with either a 25G spinal needle (group 1, n=85) or with a 27 G needle (group 2, n=85). Data collection was done focusing on the incidence of PDPH postoperatively. Data analysis was done by STATA 17 software. Results: A total of 170 pregnant women of CS were included in this study, who were divided in to two groups (n=85 for each group) based on the needle used during spinal anaesthesia as group 1with 25G and group 2 with 27G needle size. Age and weight distribution of pregnant women were similar in both groups, with the mean age of 27.1 years in group 1 and 26.5 years in group 2. The mean weight of the both groups were 62.0kg and 60.9kg respectively for group1 & 2. The heart rate (82.8 vs 81.6bpm) and mean BP (91.0 vs 90.1mmhg) between group 1 vs group 2 was similar between the two groups. The incidence of PDPH was higher in group 1 (25G) (16.5%) subjects than in group 2 subjects (27G) (6.1%), and the incidence rate is significantly lower (p<0.05) in the finer needle size. The trials required to attain CSF is higher in group 2, and a finer needle takes more attempts to collect CSF. Conclusion: This study concludes that due to the lower frequency of PDPH with a 27G needle, it should be given preference for applying spinal anaesthesia over a 25G needle. Moreover, it is technically more time-consuming to administer spinal anesthesia with a 27G needle than other.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i29s.6754
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of 25G and 27G Quincke Spinal Needles for Post-Dural Puncture Headache Following Caesarean Section

Syed Raashid Andrabi, Anumeha Jain, Sree Lakshimi
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Evaluation of 25G and 27G Quincke Spinal Needles for Post-Dural Puncture Headache Following Caesarean Section

Syed Raashid Andrabi, Anumeha Jain, Sree Lakshimi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) remains a well-recognized health concern following a spinal anesthesia for a caesarean section (CS). To weigh the PDPH during CS, a comparison was made between 25G and 27G Quincke spinal needles. Methods: The prospective, single blind, cross sectional study study was conducted at the Centurion University, Vizianagaram, Vishakhapatnam, India,85 primiparous women aged 18-36 years were selected and classified as group 1 & 2, based on the type of needle used to receive anaesthesia for elective CS. The subjects were allocated to receive spinal anaesthesia with either a 25G spinal needle (group 1, n=85) or with a 27 G needle (group 2, n=85). Data collection was done focusing on the incidence of PDPH postoperatively. Data analysis was done by STATA 17 software. Results: A total of 170 pregnant women of CS were included in this study, who were divided in to two groups (n=85 for each group) based on the needle used during spinal anaesthesia as group 1with 25G and group 2 with 27G needle size. Age and weight distribution of pregnant women were similar in both groups, with the mean age of 27.1 years in group 1 and 26.5 years in group 2. The mean weight of the both groups were 62.0kg and 60.9kg respectively for group1 & 2. The heart rate (82.8 vs 81.6bpm) and mean BP (91.0 vs 90.1mmhg) between group 1 vs group 2 was similar between the two groups. The incidence of PDPH was higher in group 1 (25G) (16.5%) subjects than in group 2 subjects (27G) (6.1%), and the incidence rate is significantly lower (p<0.05) in the finer needle size. The trials required to attain CSF is higher in group 2, and a finer needle takes more attempts to collect CSF. Conclusion: This study concludes that due to the lower frequency of PDPH with a 27G needle, it should be given preference for applying spinal anaesthesia over a 25G needle. Moreover, it is technically more time-consuming to administer spinal anesthesia with a 27G needle than other.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(29S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.