Generating Constructionist Criteria for AI Educational Technology

With so many artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the sphere of education, how do you choose the ones that enable constructionist learning for K-12 students? It is hard to stay apprised of every AI edtech tool that comes on the market, let alone take the time to critically evaluate its usefulness for constructionist learning environments. In this hands-on and highly collaborative workshop, participants will draw upon their personal experience with constructionist tools to collaboratively develop a set of criteria to define effective constructionist tools. This set of criteria will then be used to analyze AI tools. Participants will have time to tinker with their tool of choice to evaluate its affordances for constructionist learning. Finally, participants will share reviews of the tools they analyzed and any additional criteria they created for evaluating these AI edtech tools. This workshop provides a supportive environment for teachers, students, researchers, and other education experts to wrestle with the critical question of how we can utilize AI tools to empower students to construct their own knowledge. Participants will leave with peer reviews of AI tools, a deeper understanding of how AI can or cannot be used to construct knowledge, and possible inspiration for using AI as a tool for constructionist learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constructionism Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/35.x
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating Constructionist Criteria for AI Educational Technology

Sarah Wharton, Lydia Guterman, Mary Cate Gustafson-Quiett
Constructionism Conference Proceedings
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Generating Constructionist Criteria for AI Educational Technology

Sarah Wharton, Lydia Guterman, Mary Cate Gustafson-Quiett
article en

Abstract

With so many artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the sphere of education, how do you choose the ones that enable constructionist learning for K-12 students? It is hard to stay apprised of every AI edtech tool that comes on the market, let alone take the time to critically evaluate its usefulness for constructionist learning environments. In this hands-on and highly collaborative workshop, participants will draw upon their personal experience with constructionist tools to collaboratively develop a set of criteria to define effective constructionist tools. This set of criteria will then be used to analyze AI tools. Participants will have time to tinker with their tool of choice to evaluate its affordances for constructionist learning. Finally, participants will share reviews of the tools they analyzed and any additional criteria they created for evaluating these AI edtech tools. This workshop provides a supportive environment for teachers, students, researchers, and other education experts to wrestle with the critical question of how we can utilize AI tools to empower students to construct their own knowledge. Participants will leave with peer reviews of AI tools, a deeper understanding of how AI can or cannot be used to construct knowledge, and possible inspiration for using AI as a tool for constructionist learning.

Constructionism Conference ProceedingsVol. 8
Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.