Emotional aspects in the doctoral supervision relationship. Limitations and permissibility

The supervisor-doctoral student interaction is no exception, in my opinion, in the foundations on which it is built, ultimately involving criteria similar to any type of relationship. It is obvious, however, that, settling between two personalities (supposedly) in a relationship of subordination at least from a professional point of view, but (possibly) also character-wise, there will be factors that determine and establish it different from the usual communication. The purpose of the lecture with the above title is to distinguish and establish, as far as possible, the “boundaries” that are imposed in this relationship, the emotional impact on the two partners during the doctoral course, the various situations in which it can be manifested, but also its possible excessive presence leading, perhaps, to the interruption of the collaboration between them. Taking into account the fact that I have not yet gone through the whole process, I will especially use the materials based on the study of the psychology of relationships registered in this category and on the examples provided by others in the field in which I am active (and not only), but also on my short experience on this fragile ground. I do not propose to approach this topic as an exhaustive one, considering this impossible to achieve taking into account the dynamics of this type of communication, but intending that at the end of the lecture I have managed to offer as comprehensive a perspective as possible on the rules that must be respected (by both partners), as well as on the level of tolerance that can be reached in specific situations. Keywords: emotional, supervision, ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35218/icds-2024-0020
Primary Topic
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional aspects in the doctoral supervision relationship. Limitations and permissibility

Ileana OCNEANU
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
article

Emotional aspects in the doctoral supervision relationship. Limitations and permissibility

Ileana OCNEANU
article en

Abstract

The supervisor-doctoral student interaction is no exception, in my opinion, in the foundations on which it is built, ultimately involving criteria similar to any type of relationship. It is obvious, however, that, settling between two personalities (supposedly) in a relationship of subordination at least from a professional point of view, but (possibly) also character-wise, there will be factors that determine and establish it different from the usual communication. The purpose of the lecture with the above title is to distinguish and establish, as far as possible, the “boundaries” that are imposed in this relationship, the emotional impact on the two partners during the doctoral course, the various situations in which it can be manifested, but also its possible excessive presence leading, perhaps, to the interruption of the collaboration between them. Taking into account the fact that I have not yet gone through the whole process, I will especially use the materials based on the study of the psychology of relationships registered in this category and on the examples provided by others in the field in which I am active (and not only), but also on my short experience on this fragile ground. I do not propose to approach this topic as an exhaustive one, considering this impossible to achieve taking into account the dynamics of this type of communication, but intending that at the end of the lecture I have managed to offer as comprehensive a perspective as possible on the rules that must be respected (by both partners), as well as on the level of tolerance that can be reached in specific situations. Keywords: emotional, supervision, ethics.

George Enescu University of Arts of Iași (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.