Comparing greenhouse gas stable isotopes from different sampling methods: Aquifer groundwater and coal seam gas production waters

Methane and carbon dioxide are ubiquitous in aquifers and are gaining increased attention through global warming. The stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane and carbon dioxide, δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2 and δ 2 H-CH 4 , can inform on the sources of gas in groundwater and determine if the origin is via thermogenic or different biogenic (microbial) processes. This can, for example, inform if there is connectivity between gas reservoirs and overlying aquifers. These stable isotopes are also used in monitoring in a range of settings, for example, during CO 2 geological storage. The pumping of groundwater to the surface results in depressurisation and gas effervescence, therefore the sampling method (i.e. if the sample contacts atmosphere) is known to affect measured dissolved gas concentrations; however, the effect of sample collection on the stable isotopes remains unresolved. Gas stable isotopes can be collected in the field in a range of sample containers, including dissolved gases in exetainer vials or Isoflasks; or free gases in gas bags or cylinders. Aquifer groundwaters, coal seam gas (CSG) production waters, and CSG free gases were collected from a range of bores for δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2, and δ 2 H-CH 4 analysis. Sample pairs of dissolved gases from exetainer vials and Isoflasks were mainly compared and generally had excellent low directional percentage variabilities. A subset of sample pairs from other containers (including free gas in gas cylinders or gas bags) were also compared with consistent stable isotope signatures generally measured. This brings confidence for using different sample containers if needed for different field conditions and situations. • Dissolved and free gas sampled from coal seam gas reservoir production wells and aquifers • Dissolved δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2 and δ 2 H-CH 4 compared between different sample containers • Signatures of dissolved gas and free gas collected in up to 5 different sample containers • Isotope signatures from each bore generally comparable with low percentage variabilities • Dissolved methane from exetainer vials or Isoflasks can be used with comparable results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geochemistry
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106482
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing greenhouse gas stable isotopes from different sampling methods: Aquifer groundwater and coal seam gas production waters

Julie K. Pearce, K. A. Baublys, Harald Hofmann
1 citations
Applied Geochemistry
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

Comparing greenhouse gas stable isotopes from different sampling methods: Aquifer groundwater and coal seam gas production waters

Julie K. Pearce, K. A. Baublys, Harald Hofmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Methane and carbon dioxide are ubiquitous in aquifers and are gaining increased attention through global warming. The stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane and carbon dioxide, δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2 and δ 2 H-CH 4 , can inform on the sources of gas in groundwater and determine if the origin is via thermogenic or different biogenic (microbial) processes. This can, for example, inform if there is connectivity between gas reservoirs and overlying aquifers. These stable isotopes are also used in monitoring in a range of settings, for example, during CO 2 geological storage. The pumping of groundwater to the surface results in depressurisation and gas effervescence, therefore the sampling method (i.e. if the sample contacts atmosphere) is known to affect measured dissolved gas concentrations; however, the effect of sample collection on the stable isotopes remains unresolved. Gas stable isotopes can be collected in the field in a range of sample containers, including dissolved gases in exetainer vials or Isoflasks; or free gases in gas bags or cylinders. Aquifer groundwaters, coal seam gas (CSG) production waters, and CSG free gases were collected from a range of bores for δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2, and δ 2 H-CH 4 analysis. Sample pairs of dissolved gases from exetainer vials and Isoflasks were mainly compared and generally had excellent low directional percentage variabilities. A subset of sample pairs from other containers (including free gas in gas cylinders or gas bags) were also compared with consistent stable isotope signatures generally measured. This brings confidence for using different sample containers if needed for different field conditions and situations. • Dissolved and free gas sampled from coal seam gas reservoir production wells and aquifers • Dissolved δ 13 C-CH 4 , δ 13 C-CO 2 and δ 2 H-CH 4 compared between different sample containers • Signatures of dissolved gas and free gas collected in up to 5 different sample containers • Isotope signatures from each bore generally comparable with low percentage variabilities • Dissolved methane from exetainer vials or Isoflasks can be used with comparable results

Applied GeochemistryVol. 190
The University of Queensland (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.