Benefit sharing of marine genetic resources and intellectual property protection under the BBNJ agreement

The relationship between benefit-sharing of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction and the intellectual property system has been a focal issue in past negotiations of the BBNJ Agreement. The legal status of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction is contentious. Although the BBNJ Agreement stops short of legally defining marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction as “common heritage of mankind,” it adopts the principle as a guiding normative framework. The protection of specific knowledge information derived from the development of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction through the intellectual property system is not incompatible with the principle of the common heritage of mankind, nor does it conflict with relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Intellectual property protection can be integrated with benefit-sharing, and the current focus should be on improving the benefit-sharing mechanism within the intellectual property framework. The benefit-sharing mechanism for intellectual property associated with marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction should emphasize non-monetary forms, achievable through international treaties under WTO and WIPO platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1631043
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefit sharing of marine genetic resources and intellectual property protection under the BBNJ agreement

Qing Xu, Yanchao Jin
3 citations
Frontiers in Marine Science
Intellectual Property and Patents
8.28
article

Benefit sharing of marine genetic resources and intellectual property protection under the BBNJ agreement

Qing Xu, Yanchao Jin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The relationship between benefit-sharing of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction and the intellectual property system has been a focal issue in past negotiations of the BBNJ Agreement. The legal status of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction is contentious. Although the BBNJ Agreement stops short of legally defining marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction as “common heritage of mankind,” it adopts the principle as a guiding normative framework. The protection of specific knowledge information derived from the development of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction through the intellectual property system is not incompatible with the principle of the common heritage of mankind, nor does it conflict with relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Intellectual property protection can be integrated with benefit-sharing, and the current focus should be on improving the benefit-sharing mechanism within the intellectual property framework. The benefit-sharing mechanism for intellectual property associated with marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction should emphasize non-monetary forms, achievable through international treaties under WTO and WIPO platforms.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
Jinan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intellectual Property and Patents
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.