A Maturity Model for Practical Explainability in Artificial Intelligence‐Based Applications: Integrating Analysis and Evaluation (MM4XAI‐AE) Models

The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in critical domains such as healthcare, law, and defense demands robust mechanisms to ensure transparency and explainability in decision‐making processes. While machine learning and deep learning algorithms have advanced significantly, their growing complexity presents persistent interpretability challenges. Existing maturity frameworks, such as Capability Maturity Model Integration, fall short in addressing the distinct requirements of explainability in AI systems, particularly where ethical compliance and public trust are paramount. To address this gap, we propose the Maturity Model for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence: Analysis and Evaluation (MM4XAI‐AE), a domain‐agnostic maturity model tailored to assess and guide the practical deployment of explainability in AI‐based applications. The model integrates two complementary components: an analysis model and an evaluation model, structured across four maturity levels—operational, justified, formalized, and managed. It evaluates explainability across three critical dimensions: technical foundations, structured design, and human‐centered explainability. MM4XAI‐AE is grounded in the PAG‐XAI framework, emphasizing the interrelated dimensions of practicality, auditability, and governance, thereby aligning with current reflections on responsible and trustworthy AI. The MM4XAI‐AE model is empirically validated through a structured evaluation of thirteen published AI applications from diverse sectors, analyzing their design and deployment practices. The results show a wide distribution across maturity levels, underscoring the model’s capacity to identify strengths, gaps, and actionable pathways for improving explainability. This work offers a structured and scalable framework to standardize explainability practices and supports researchers, developers, and policymakers in fostering more transparent, ethical, and trustworthy AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/int/4934696
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Maturity Model for Practical Explainability in Artificial Intelligence‐Based Applications: Integrating Analysis and Evaluation (MM4XAI‐AE) Models

Julián Muñoz-Ordóñez, Carlos Cobos, Francisco Herrera, Juan-Carlos Vidal-Rojas
1 citations
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

A Maturity Model for Practical Explainability in Artificial Intelligence‐Based Applications: Integrating Analysis and Evaluation (MM4XAI‐AE) Models

Julián Muñoz-Ordóñez, Carlos Cobos, Francisco Herrera, Juan-Carlos Vidal-Rojas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in critical domains such as healthcare, law, and defense demands robust mechanisms to ensure transparency and explainability in decision‐making processes. While machine learning and deep learning algorithms have advanced significantly, their growing complexity presents persistent interpretability challenges. Existing maturity frameworks, such as Capability Maturity Model Integration, fall short in addressing the distinct requirements of explainability in AI systems, particularly where ethical compliance and public trust are paramount. To address this gap, we propose the Maturity Model for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence: Analysis and Evaluation (MM4XAI‐AE), a domain‐agnostic maturity model tailored to assess and guide the practical deployment of explainability in AI‐based applications. The model integrates two complementary components: an analysis model and an evaluation model, structured across four maturity levels—operational, justified, formalized, and managed. It evaluates explainability across three critical dimensions: technical foundations, structured design, and human‐centered explainability. MM4XAI‐AE is grounded in the PAG‐XAI framework, emphasizing the interrelated dimensions of practicality, auditability, and governance, thereby aligning with current reflections on responsible and trustworthy AI. The MM4XAI‐AE model is empirically validated through a structured evaluation of thirteen published AI applications from diverse sectors, analyzing their design and deployment practices. The results show a wide distribution across maturity levels, underscoring the model’s capacity to identify strengths, gaps, and actionable pathways for improving explainability. This work offers a structured and scalable framework to standardize explainability practices and supports researchers, developers, and policymakers in fostering more transparent, ethical, and trustworthy AI systems.

International Journal of Intelligent SystemsVol. 2025(1)
University of Cauca (CO), Universidad de Granada (ES), Corporación Universitaria Comfacauca - Unicomfacauca (CO), University of the Americas (CL), Instituto Profesional Providencia (CL)
European Commission, Universidad del Cauca, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.