Monarchy, Sangha and State: The Historical Dynamics of Monastic Reforms in Thailand, 18–21st Centuries

This article traces the historical trajectory of monastic reforms in Thailand from King Rama I’s coronation (1782) to the 2017 amendments to the Sangha Act. Its aim is to uncover the cyclic interaction among monarchy, Sang-ha, and state, and to show how changing political regimes reshaped monastic autonomy. The study employs a multi-layered methodology: source-critical analysis of royal edicts and Sangha legislation, comparative histori-cal mapping of centralization phases, quantitative assessment of clerical and fiscal trends, and legal herme-neutics of “Buddhist constitutionalism”. Findings reveal a “reactive spiral” in which every regime tightened bu-reaucratic oversight, prompting reformist counter-movements within the Sangha. Today, the key challenge lies in financial transparency and monks’ digital presence. A hybrid decentralization model is proposed as the most sustainable equilibrium between religious autonomy and state patronage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Общество философия история культура
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2025.6.18
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monarchy, Sangha and State: The Historical Dynamics of Monastic Reforms in Thailand, 18–21st Centuries

Phra Paron Phunthasane
Общество философия история культура
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Monarchy, Sangha and State: The Historical Dynamics of Monastic Reforms in Thailand, 18–21st Centuries

Phra Paron Phunthasane
article en

Abstract

This article traces the historical trajectory of monastic reforms in Thailand from King Rama I’s coronation (1782) to the 2017 amendments to the Sangha Act. Its aim is to uncover the cyclic interaction among monarchy, Sang-ha, and state, and to show how changing political regimes reshaped monastic autonomy. The study employs a multi-layered methodology: source-critical analysis of royal edicts and Sangha legislation, comparative histori-cal mapping of centralization phases, quantitative assessment of clerical and fiscal trends, and legal herme-neutics of “Buddhist constitutionalism”. Findings reveal a “reactive spiral” in which every regime tightened bu-reaucratic oversight, prompting reformist counter-movements within the Sangha. Today, the key challenge lies in financial transparency and monks’ digital presence. A hybrid decentralization model is proposed as the most sustainable equilibrium between religious autonomy and state patronage.

Общество философия история культура(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.