Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration

The conservation of plant genetic resources (PGR) is critical to ensuring global food security and agricultural sustainability. Genebanks play a vital role in ex situ conservation, complementing in situ strategies by preserving crop diversity (incl. their wild relatives) and providing access to biological materials for research, breeding and farming. However, maintaining high conservation standards and ensuring accessibility remains a global challenge. To address this, the ‘Genebank Peer Review’ system was developed as a collaborative quality assessment and improvement mechanism. This system facilitates reciprocal evaluations among genebanks, promoting transparency, capacity building and continuous improvement in conservation practices. Implemented in Europe since 2019, the peer review process involves structured self-assessments, site visits and expert evaluations, culminating in publicly available reports that guide genebanks in enhancing their operations. Feedback from participating institutions highlights the system's effectiveness in fostering knowledge exchange, strengthening professional networks and improving genebank management practices. Despite its success, challenges remain, particularly regarding expert availability and resource constraints. Future efforts should focus on institutionalizing mentorship programmes to sustain and expand the impact of Genebank Peer Reviews and monitor improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetic Resources
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.oadz7911
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration

María José Díez, Luís Guasch, T.J.L. van Hintum, U. Lohwasser et al.
1 citations
Genetic Resources
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
article

Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration

María José Díez, Luís Guasch, T.J.L. van Hintum, U. Lohwasser, Gergana Desheva, Sharon T. Balding, Katya Uzundzhalieva, Beate Schierscher-Viret, L. Papoušková, Pavol Hauptvogel, Dagmar Janovská, John Dickie, Lise Lykke Steffensen, José Vicente Valcárcel, V. Holubec, Patrizia Vaccino, I. Martín
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The conservation of plant genetic resources (PGR) is critical to ensuring global food security and agricultural sustainability. Genebanks play a vital role in ex situ conservation, complementing in situ strategies by preserving crop diversity (incl. their wild relatives) and providing access to biological materials for research, breeding and farming. However, maintaining high conservation standards and ensuring accessibility remains a global challenge. To address this, the ‘Genebank Peer Review’ system was developed as a collaborative quality assessment and improvement mechanism. This system facilitates reciprocal evaluations among genebanks, promoting transparency, capacity building and continuous improvement in conservation practices. Implemented in Europe since 2019, the peer review process involves structured self-assessments, site visits and expert evaluations, culminating in publicly available reports that guide genebanks in enhancing their operations. Feedback from participating institutions highlights the system's effectiveness in fostering knowledge exchange, strengthening professional networks and improving genebank management practices. Despite its success, challenges remain, particularly regarding expert availability and resource constraints. Future efforts should focus on institutionalizing mentorship programmes to sustain and expand the impact of Genebank Peer Reviews and monitor improvements.

Genetic ResourcesVol. 6(11)
Czech Agrifood Research Center (CZ), Millennium Science Initiative (CL), Cereal Research Centre (IT), Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (ES), Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) (DE), Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics (BG), Agroscope (CH), National Agricultural and Food Centre (SK), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.