Israeli Film Culture through Its Paratexts: A New Cinema History

In the introduction to his co-edited anthology Looking Past the Screen (2007), Eric Smoodin asks us to imagine an alternative mode of film historiography to the one most present in global cinema studies.Scholarship, he argues, "has at least since the mid-1950s been dominated by the study of the film itself, often organized around genre, nation, or authorship." 1 This foregrounding of "representation" as a category encompassing "the images and narratives that make up the text," has in turn led to the sidelining of interest in other categories meaningful to the formation of cinema history: those of industry, including the mechanisms of production, distribution, and exhibition; of regulation, both external and internal to the film business; and of reception, which speaks to the makeup of actual audiences, where/how they consumed films, and what recollections they have from the experience. 2 Not only that, but in the process of looking away from these categories, film historiography also paid little attention to the types of data that may inform our knowledge of industry, regulation, and reception: primary sources other than the films themselves, which "will most typically be on paper (and on microfilm and the Internet) as the material evidence left, for instance, by fans, censors, critics, and government officials." 3Abandoning these materials-and more broadly, the archive that holds them-has resulted in a self-imposed myopia whose effects on our historical understanding of cinematic phenomena have been highly detrimental.It is with acute awareness of this cost that Smoodin calls for exploring a possible "film scholarship without films," 4 which may complement as well as correct the discipline's prevalent norms.Smoodin's call served to both reflect upon and further galvanize "an emerging international trend" within film studies, often referred to as "new cinema history." 5 Originating from such seminal American-centered scholarly literature as David Bordwell,

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Jewish identities
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jji.2025.a963594
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Israeli Film Culture through Its Paratexts: A New Cinema History

Dan Chyutin, Yael Mazor
Journal of Jewish identities
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Israeli Film Culture through Its Paratexts: A New Cinema History

Dan Chyutin, Yael Mazor
article en

Abstract

In the introduction to his co-edited anthology Looking Past the Screen (2007), Eric Smoodin asks us to imagine an alternative mode of film historiography to the one most present in global cinema studies.Scholarship, he argues, "has at least since the mid-1950s been dominated by the study of the film itself, often organized around genre, nation, or authorship." 1 This foregrounding of "representation" as a category encompassing "the images and narratives that make up the text," has in turn led to the sidelining of interest in other categories meaningful to the formation of cinema history: those of industry, including the mechanisms of production, distribution, and exhibition; of regulation, both external and internal to the film business; and of reception, which speaks to the makeup of actual audiences, where/how they consumed films, and what recollections they have from the experience. 2 Not only that, but in the process of looking away from these categories, film historiography also paid little attention to the types of data that may inform our knowledge of industry, regulation, and reception: primary sources other than the films themselves, which "will most typically be on paper (and on microfilm and the Internet) as the material evidence left, for instance, by fans, censors, critics, and government officials." 3Abandoning these materials-and more broadly, the archive that holds them-has resulted in a self-imposed myopia whose effects on our historical understanding of cinematic phenomena have been highly detrimental.It is with acute awareness of this cost that Smoodin calls for exploring a possible "film scholarship without films," 4 which may complement as well as correct the discipline's prevalent norms.Smoodin's call served to both reflect upon and further galvanize "an emerging international trend" within film studies, often referred to as "new cinema history." 5 Originating from such seminal American-centered scholarly literature as David Bordwell,

Journal of Jewish identitiesVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.