A Replication of “Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size”

ABSTRACT This manuscript replicates and extends the work of Alonso et al. focusing on the effects of New Public Management practices—outsourcing and decentralization—on public sector size in terms of government expenditure and employment. The narrow replication confirms the original findings: outsourcing increases government expenditure, whereas decentralization reduces it, with neither practice affecting employment. The wide replications add nuances: while the long‐term results align with the original study, recent data indicate that outsourcing may have narrowed its cost gap with in‐house delivery, and the cost‐reducing impact of decentralization has partially waned. It suggests that the influences of these NPM practices on public sector size have diminished in recent years. This replication illuminates the temporal complexity and evolving nature of the NPM practices and their impacts on public sector size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Replication of “Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size”

Yiying Chen
1 citations
Public Administration
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
article

A Replication of “Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size”

Yiying Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This manuscript replicates and extends the work of Alonso et al. focusing on the effects of New Public Management practices—outsourcing and decentralization—on public sector size in terms of government expenditure and employment. The narrow replication confirms the original findings: outsourcing increases government expenditure, whereas decentralization reduces it, with neither practice affecting employment. The wide replications add nuances: while the long‐term results align with the original study, recent data indicate that outsourcing may have narrowed its cost gap with in‐house delivery, and the cost‐reducing impact of decentralization has partially waned. It suggests that the influences of these NPM practices on public sector size have diminished in recent years. This replication illuminates the temporal complexity and evolving nature of the NPM practices and their impacts on public sector size.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(3)
Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Replication of “Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size” — Yiying Chen · Public Administration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS