Cash Hedging Versus Responsive Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis Under Price Competition

ABSTRACT We investigate the interaction between cash hedging and responsive pricing in mitigating cash flow risks under price competition. Cash hedging smooths cash flows with financial instruments, while responsive pricing provides firms with operational flexibility to postpone pricing after the realization of cash flows. The firms' cash flows are correlated. We first investigate the equilibria in a single‐strategy game where cash hedging and responsive pricing cannot be used simultaneously. Our results show that fierce competition induces heterogeneous choices in cash hedging and responsive pricing, and this heterogeneity is amplified as cash flow correlation increases from negative to positive. We further explore the equilibria in a full game setting where cash hedging and responsive pricing can be used simultaneously. Homogeneous choices within a combined strategy often conflict with firms' profit objectives, as limited pricing flexibility and constrained cost‐reduction stability fail to effectively manage cash flow risks. Conversely, heterogeneous choices in a single strategy and a combined strategy can be advantageous, particularly in relatively stable markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22273
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash Hedging Versus Responsive Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis Under Price Competition

Weili Xue, Jing Chen, Yi Yang
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Cash Hedging Versus Responsive Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis Under Price Competition

Weili Xue, Jing Chen, Yi Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the interaction between cash hedging and responsive pricing in mitigating cash flow risks under price competition. Cash hedging smooths cash flows with financial instruments, while responsive pricing provides firms with operational flexibility to postpone pricing after the realization of cash flows. The firms' cash flows are correlated. We first investigate the equilibria in a single‐strategy game where cash hedging and responsive pricing cannot be used simultaneously. Our results show that fierce competition induces heterogeneous choices in cash hedging and responsive pricing, and this heterogeneity is amplified as cash flow correlation increases from negative to positive. We further explore the equilibria in a full game setting where cash hedging and responsive pricing can be used simultaneously. Homogeneous choices within a combined strategy often conflict with firms' profit objectives, as limited pricing flexibility and constrained cost‐reduction stability fail to effectively manage cash flow risks. Conversely, heterogeneous choices in a single strategy and a combined strategy can be advantageous, particularly in relatively stable markets.

Naval Research Logistics (NRL)Vol. 72(8)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cash Hedging Versus Responsive Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis Under Price Competition — Weili Xue, Jing Chen, et al. · Naval Research Logistics (NRL) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS