Revegetation decisions have genetic consequences: actively and passively restored salt marshes display different genetic diversity and composition

Genetic diversity facilitates common restoration goals like creating resilient and adaptable populations. Yet, the genetic consequences of restoration are rarely considered. To inform and motivate the inclusion of genetic diversity into restoration decision‐making, we assessed the genetic diversity of the salt marsh foundation species Spartina alterniflora in three types of salt marshes: actively planted restored sites, passively colonized restored sites, and natural marshes. We found that active restoration was associated with higher genetic diversity, whereas passive restoration and natural marshes were equivalently associated with lower genetic diversity. All three marsh types had disparate genetic composition, but only actively restored sites contained seemingly non‐local genotypes. These distinct genetic outcomes likely have proportionally distinct implications for eco‐evolutionary processes. Our work adds to growing evidence that genetic diversity can be influenced by restoration decisions and should therefore be considered during restoration planning and in restoration policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70122
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revegetation decisions have genetic consequences: actively and passively restored salt marshes display different genetic diversity and composition

Katie P. Sperry, Sarah C. Crosby, Anne Randall Hughes, Anna Bartholet
Restoration Ecology
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Revegetation decisions have genetic consequences: actively and passively restored salt marshes display different genetic diversity and composition

Katie P. Sperry, Sarah C. Crosby, Anne Randall Hughes, Anna Bartholet
article en

Abstract

Genetic diversity facilitates common restoration goals like creating resilient and adaptable populations. Yet, the genetic consequences of restoration are rarely considered. To inform and motivate the inclusion of genetic diversity into restoration decision‐making, we assessed the genetic diversity of the salt marsh foundation species Spartina alterniflora in three types of salt marshes: actively planted restored sites, passively colonized restored sites, and natural marshes. We found that active restoration was associated with higher genetic diversity, whereas passive restoration and natural marshes were equivalently associated with lower genetic diversity. All three marsh types had disparate genetic composition, but only actively restored sites contained seemingly non‐local genotypes. These distinct genetic outcomes likely have proportionally distinct implications for eco‐evolutionary processes. Our work adds to growing evidence that genetic diversity can be influenced by restoration decisions and should therefore be considered during restoration planning and in restoration policy.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(7)
Norwalk Hospital (US), Northeastern University (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Connecticut, Connecticut Sea Grant, University of Connecticut
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revegetation decisions have genetic consequences: actively and passively restored salt marshes display different genetic diversity and composition — Katie P. Sperry, Sarah C. Crosby, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS