Legal Regulation of Algorithmic Discrimination and the Construction of a Digital Equity Platform

数字社会中，算法歧视的法律规制面临传统反歧视法范式失灵与技术治理碎片化的困境。以算法歧视的法律规制为核心，通过对美国COMPAS算法在刑事司法中的歧视等案例分析，解构算法歧视的生成机理，揭示其本质是数据偏见、算法黑箱与权力异化的权利侵害链条，提出技术合规、法律嵌入、社会共治的治理路径，通过法律代码化将技术标准上升为数字社会的“软性宪法”，并设计合规标准的全过程治理平台，重构数字正义的实现路径，推动算法治理从事后救济迈向全过程法治，为破解算法治理的“科林格里奇困境”提供方案。In the digital society, the legal regulation of algorithmic discrimination faces dual challenges: the failure of traditional anti-discrimination legal paradigms and the fragmentation of technology governance. Focusing on the legal regulation of algorithmic discrimination, this study deconstructs its generative mechanisms through case analyses such as discrimination in the U.S. COMPAS algorithm within criminal justice. It reveals its essence as a chain of rights infringement comprising data bias, algorithmic black boxes, and power alienation. The research proposes a governance framework integrating technical compliance, legal embedding, and social co-governance. By codifying legal standards into “soft constitutional” norms for the digital society and designing a whole-process governance platform with compliance standards, it reconstructs the pathway to digital equity. This approach shifts algorithmic governance from post-hoc remedies to comprehensive rule of law throughout the entire process, offering solutions to overcome the “Collingridge Dilemma” in algorithmic governance.