Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup> equation are brought to light

A thorough scrutiny of Einstein’s derivation of the mass‐energy equivalence (MEE) equation reveals that the MEE equation derivation is based on conceptually as well as mathematically incorrect concepts. The mistaken application of the Lorentz transformation factor, which has now been conclusively proven to be incorrect, as an indispensable mathematical tool has been shown to be crucial. A critical review of the purported interconversions between mass and energy that the MEE principle asserts conclusively proves that the occurrence of such interconversions could take place only through violating the well-established laws of nature—the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass. The theory has also been shown to not be in conformity with the principle of causality. A thorough analysis of the conceptual foundation of E = mc 2 yields a host of conflicting and self-contradictory consequences, providing convincing evidence that E = mc 2 is not the correct equation. It is concluded that the MEE equation cannot be justified to be correct by any physical reasonings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physics Essays
Published
2025-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-38.2.107
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc2 equation are brought to light

Suniti K. Ghoshal
Physics Essays
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc2 equation are brought to light

Suniti K. Ghoshal
article en

Abstract

A thorough scrutiny of Einstein’s derivation of the mass‐energy equivalence (MEE) equation reveals that the MEE equation derivation is based on conceptually as well as mathematically incorrect concepts. The mistaken application of the Lorentz transformation factor, which has now been conclusively proven to be incorrect, as an indispensable mathematical tool has been shown to be crucial. A critical review of the purported interconversions between mass and energy that the MEE principle asserts conclusively proves that the occurrence of such interconversions could take place only through violating the well-established laws of nature—the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass. The theory has also been shown to not be in conformity with the principle of causality. A thorough analysis of the conceptual foundation of E = mc 2 yields a host of conflicting and self-contradictory consequences, providing convincing evidence that E = mc 2 is not the correct equation. It is concluded that the MEE equation cannot be justified to be correct by any physical reasonings.

Physics EssaysVol. 38(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.