Pedagogical considerations in the automation era: A systematic literature review of <scp>AIEd</scp> in K‐12 authentic settings

Abstract The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) into education holds promise for supporting and augmenting teaching and learning‐related activities. Yet, despite its potential, there is limited empirical research on the use of AI in K‐12 settings exploring the pedagogical grounding, impact and implications of the technological solutions. The current paper reports a systematic literature review of 28 papers that addresses the topic of AI technologies in authentic settings. We applied etic and emic content analysis to the collected data. Our results indicated that most AI research is conducted in China and the United States, and investigates AI solutions for primary education. As main AI technologies we found social robots, augmented reality and intelligent systems. The review also revealed that half of the papers lack a solid pedagogical foundation and a contextualisation under concrete course conditions. Finally, most AI solutions focus mainly on learning outcomes without exploring the teacher needs and impressions. Our findings suggest the need for research to focus on: (a) AIEd localisation to fit the AI context of different regions; (b) contextualisation of the tool design under several course conditions and learning theories; (c) equal attention on teacher agency and autonomy within the AIEd era; and (d) systematisation of the evaluation of sustained pedagogical effects (e.g., cognitive, relational, affective effects) apart from student learning outcomes. We envision that our research can support the design, development and deployment of AI tools in K‐12 under such pedagogical considerations, hence contributing to strengthen the ties between pedagogy and AI practices in authentic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4200
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical considerations in the automation era: A systematic literature review of AIEd in K‐12 authentic settings

Paraskevi Topali, Inge Molenaar, Carla Haelermans, Eliane Segers
8 citations
British Educational Research Journal
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
article

Pedagogical considerations in the automation era: A systematic literature review of AIEd in K‐12 authentic settings

Paraskevi Topali, Inge Molenaar, Carla Haelermans, Eliane Segers
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) into education holds promise for supporting and augmenting teaching and learning‐related activities. Yet, despite its potential, there is limited empirical research on the use of AI in K‐12 settings exploring the pedagogical grounding, impact and implications of the technological solutions. The current paper reports a systematic literature review of 28 papers that addresses the topic of AI technologies in authentic settings. We applied etic and emic content analysis to the collected data. Our results indicated that most AI research is conducted in China and the United States, and investigates AI solutions for primary education. As main AI technologies we found social robots, augmented reality and intelligent systems. The review also revealed that half of the papers lack a solid pedagogical foundation and a contextualisation under concrete course conditions. Finally, most AI solutions focus mainly on learning outcomes without exploring the teacher needs and impressions. Our findings suggest the need for research to focus on: (a) AIEd localisation to fit the AI context of different regions; (b) contextualisation of the tool design under several course conditions and learning theories; (c) equal attention on teacher agency and autonomy within the AIEd era; and (d) systematisation of the evaluation of sustained pedagogical effects (e.g., cognitive, relational, affective effects) apart from student learning outcomes. We envision that our research can support the design, development and deployment of AI tools in K‐12 under such pedagogical considerations, hence contributing to strengthen the ties between pedagogy and AI practices in authentic settings.

British Educational Research JournalVol. 51(6)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Maastricht School of Management (NL), Maastricht University (NL), National Initiative for Education Research
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.